My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2017 10:54:10 AM
Creation date
5/15/2017 10:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/25/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
580
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to help stop dog attacks, with the focus frequently on banning pit bulls. However, a smarter <br /> approach is to examine the statistics in the community, seek citizen input and weigh the factors <br /> involved in the attacks. <br /> What Factors Are Involved in Severe Attacks? The CSI Impact on Breed- <br /> According to Delise, now with the National Canine <br /> DiscriminatoryImpact <br /> Research Council, the fatal dog attacks that occurred in the Ordinances•• Doggy DNA <br /> United States in 2006 had these commonalities: <br /> • 97 percent of the owners did not neuter or spay their dogs. <br /> • 84 percent of the attacks involved reckless owners— Recently, DNA testing became <br /> owners who abused or neglected their dogs, failed to available to determine a dog's <br /> contain their dogs or improperly chained their dogs. heritage. These scientific advances <br /> • 78 percent of the owners did not maintain their dogs as have impacted breed identifications <br /> pets (they were used as guard, breeding or yard dogs). by animal-control wardens, police <br /> In lieu of drafting costly breed discriminatory laws, public officers and even veterinarians. <br /> lawyers must decide if legislation targeting the <br /> If <br /> aforementioned factors would be more effective. a city or state has adopted a breed- <br /> discriminatory law, the burden of <br /> Restrict Reckless Owners from Harboring Dogs proof is on city officials to prove <br /> It makes sense to restrict or even ban reckless owners from that a dog is a member of the <br /> owning a dog—any breed of dog—because any dog can targeted breed, either through <br /> bite. And reckless owners, like reckless drivers, are often preponderance of evidence or in <br /> recidivists. Creative public lawyers have already realized some cases—if there are criminal <br /> this. penalties—beyond a reasonable <br /> doubt. <br /> In 2007, the city of St. Paul, Minnesota, passed an <br /> ordinance targeting reckless dog owners. St. Paul pet In Kansas City, a man won his <br /> owners cited more than once for abusing or neglecting an eight-month legal battle with the city <br /> animal can't legally own another pet under the ordinance. to keep his dog,Niko, after DNA <br /> The law targets pet owners who train their dogs to fight, testing proved Niko wasn't a pit <br /> puppy-mill operators and reckless dog owners. Reckless bull, as the animal-control wardens <br /> dog owners can't register a new animal if their dogs are had asserted. Niko was housed at <br /> removed twice in a five-year span. City law requires all animal control for the entire eight <br /> dogs more than three months old to have a license that months of the court case, at a great <br /> costs $50 a year; the cost is reduced to$10 a year if the cost to the town taxpayers. Niko, a <br /> animal is spayed or neutered. mixed-breed dog, is now back home <br /> after the ordeal. <br /> Also in 2007, the city of Tacoma, Washington, created an <br /> ordinance regulating"problem pet owners." A person who Breed-discriminatory laws now need <br /> commits three or more animalcontrol violations in a 24- to take DNA evidence and its cost <br /> month period can be declared a problem pet owner and into account. <br /> forced to surrender all of their animals. <br /> Encourage a Community-Policing Approach to Animal Control <br /> Since Calgary, Alberta, enacted and enforced a new aggressive-dog ordinance, the city has <br /> experienced a 56 percent decline in aggressive-dog incidents and a 21 percent decline in biting <br /> incidents in just two years. Calgary does not discriminate against particular breeds of dogs but <br /> focuses on protecting the public from all aggressive dogs regardless of breed. The city's animal- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.