My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2017 10:54:10 AM
Creation date
5/15/2017 10:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/25/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
580
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
challenging the designation, (3) ownership restrictions imposed, and (4) penalties <br /> for violation of the laws.12 <br /> Breed-Discriminatory Law and the Science of Genetics <br /> Scientific advances in canine DNA could be the beginning of the end for breed- <br /> discriminatory laws. DNA testing can be done by either a veterinarian who takes a <br /> blood sample of the dog or by a pet owner who buys a kit at PetSmart and sends <br /> the canine's cheek swab to a lab. The results of these tests are often surprising. <br /> A report by Dr. Victoria Voith and colleagues at Western University published in <br /> the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science indicates low agreement between <br /> the identification of breeds of dogs by adoption agencies and DNA identification. <br /> The dogs in this study were of unknown parentage and had been acquired from <br /> animal shelters. In only a quarter of these dogs was at least one of the breeds <br /> proposed by the animal shelters also detected as a predominant breed by DNA <br /> analysis. In 87.5% of the adopted dogs, breeds were identified by DNA that were <br /> not proposed by the animal shelters. A breed must have been detected at a <br /> minimum of 12.5% of a dog's makeup to be reported in the DNA analysis. <br /> Given the discrepancies between opinions of animal-shelter workers and <br /> identification by DNA analysis, the paper suggests re-evaluating the reliability of <br /> non-DNA breed identification and calls into question current public and private <br /> policies based on dog breeds, all of which are based on historical data dependent <br /> on visual breed identification.13 <br /> Given Voith's findings, and the ease of obtaining DNA testing, objective canine <br /> DNA testing should be the preferred method of breed identification if a local <br /> government has enacted breed-discriminatory policies. Understandably, many <br /> government attorneys haven't kept up with the science of DNA, but courts are <br /> increasingly allowing DNA evidence in breed-identification cases. <br /> 12 Cynthia McNeely&Sarah Lindquist,Dangerous Dog Laws:Failing to Give Man's Best Friend a fair Shake at Justice,3 J.Animal Law <br /> 99,112(2007). <br /> 13 Victoria L.Voith et al.,Comparison of Adoption Agency Breed Identification and DNA Breed identification of Dogs,121.Applied <br /> Animal Welfare Science 253,260 (2009). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.