Laserfiche WebLink
because there was no of tracking a dog that had been declared dangerous <br /> from locality to locality.37 <br /> Canine Profiling in Operation: No Record of Success <br /> Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies on the topic of the effectiveness of <br /> canine-profiling laws. There are only two published studies on the topic and none <br /> in the United States. However, to date, there are no studies showing that breed- <br /> discriminatory laws protect the public. <br /> The United Kingdom banned "pit bulls" in 1991. The Klaassen study examined the <br /> U.K.'s Dangerous Dog Act and concluded that the ban had no effect on stopping <br /> dog attacks.38 The study examined incidents seen at one urban accident and <br /> emergency department before the implementation of the act and again two years <br /> later. <br /> A more recent study compared dog bites reported to the public-health <br /> department of Aragon, Spain, for the five-year period before the implementation <br /> of the city's Dangerous Dog Act in 1999 and the five-year period after.39 The <br /> allegedly dangerous breeds accounted for 2.4 percent of the dog bites before the <br /> breed-discriminatory law was introduced and 3.5 percent of the dog bites after <br /> the law was implemented. The authors state that the "results suggest that BSL <br /> was fundamentally flawed ... [and] not effective in protecting people from dog <br /> bites in a significant manner.i40 <br /> These published studies from across the pond are reflected by a recent <br /> newspaper article discussing the effect of the Denver, Colorado, pit-bull ban.41 <br /> Twenty years after the ban was enacted, the director of Denver Animal Control <br /> admits that he is unable to say with any certainty whether it has made Denver any <br /> safer. Labrador retrievers—the most popular dog breed — are the most likely dog <br /> to bite in Denver. <br /> 37 Email from Michelle Welch to Ledy VanKavage,February 19,2010 (On file with author). <br /> 38 B.Klaassen,J.R.Buckley&A.Esmail,Does the Dangerous Dog Act Protect Against Animal Attacks:A Prospective Study of <br /> Mammalian Bites in the Accident and Emergency Department,27(2)Injury 89-91(1996). <br /> 39 <br /> B.Rosado et al.,Spanish:Dangerous Animals Act:Effect of the Epidemiology of Dog Bites,2(5)Journal of Veterinary Behavior 166-74 <br /> (2007). <br /> 40 Rosado,supra,at 172. <br /> 4i Peter Marcus,Do Dog Breed Bans Work?Denver Daily News,March 3,2009, <br /> http://www.thedenverdailynews.com/article.php?alD=3473. <br />