Laserfiche WebLink
on-street parking. The results of that analysis are not complete; however,the preliminary indication is <br /> that it would not create an undesirable impact on the on-street parking. If the Commission initiates <br /> consideration of the requested amendment, it is not a commitment to pport the amendment. The <br /> purpose is to begin a process where the City can get the amendmen o a public notification and review <br /> of property owners in the area. In the meantime,the City can co 4 ete the analysis, and begin review <br /> of redevelopment potential along that part of the corridor. Wit he adoption of the Downtown Plan in <br /> 2006,the City removed the off street parking requirements fo' on-residential uses which encouraged <br /> the reuse of buildings in downtown core. Mr. Giffen asked %mmissioners to agree to initiate <br /> consideration of the code amendment. The City will folio up with more information after the <br /> Engineering Department completes their on-street park; g utilization analysis and the Planning <br /> Department completes their analysis of the redevelop- ent potential. <br /> 7:33:29 PM <br /> Motion: Commissioner Olivers made a motion t. initiate the process to review the code amendment as <br /> it relates to parking along the Hewitt corridor, -.st of Broadway. Commissioner Sand seconded the <br /> motion. <br /> Chair Sosin asked if there were any ques ' ns. Commissioner Sand asked if there were any specific <br /> projects that initiated the request. Mr. iffen responded no, and that Council President Gipson thought <br /> it would be helpful for business own- . <br /> Commissioner Sand stated that tr- size of the project and the intensity of the change would have some <br /> affect as to the difficulty of rel:—sing the requirement for off-street parking. Mr. Giffen stated that he is <br /> relying on the City's Engineer' g Department to complete their analysis before Commission is asked to <br /> make any recommendatio in the amendment,that analysis should be completed. <br /> 7:35:22 PM <br /> Chair Sosin asked wh he study area was limited. Mr. Giffen responded that the request was to keep <br /> the amendment ce ered on Hewitt Avenue. Mr. Giffen referred to the graphic on the back of the <br /> memo to show w :t area is being studied by the Engineering Department. <br /> Vote: Commi•-ionerJordison,yes; Commissioner Adams,yes; Commissioner Sand,yes; Commissioner <br /> Chase,yes; r•mmissioner Olivers,yes; Commissioner Murphy,yes; and Chair Sosin,yes. <br /> ( Motion_' -rried. <br /> 7:36:42 PM <br /> Commissioner Olivers asked when the next meeting was scheduled. Mr. Koenig responded the first or <br /> third Tuesday in April. Chair Sosin stated that she would not be able to attend the meeting on April 3rd <br /> / 7:38:46 PM ADJOURNED: <br /> if; 14 <br /> 4 0 —cz <br /> PlanningCommissio l S� eta Date <br /> r1/ <br /> Kathy Davis,6Coministrative Assistant Date <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 10 <br /> March 6,2012 <br />