Laserfiche WebLink
on-street parking. The results of that analysis are not complete; however,the preliminary indication is <br /> that it would not create an undesirable impact on the on-street • rking. If the Commission initiates <br /> consideration of the requested amendment, it is not a commit r -nt to support the amendment. The <br /> purpose is to begin a process where the City can get the amen- ment to a public notification and review <br /> of property owners in the area. In the meantime,the City ca _ complete the analysis, and begin review <br /> of redevelopment potential along that part of the corridor. ith the adoption of the Downtown Plan in <br /> 2006,the City removed the off street parking requirements or non-residential uses which encouraged <br /> the reuse of buildings in downtown core. Mr. Giffen aske• ommissioners to agree to initiate <br /> consideration of the code amendment. The City will folio -up with more information after the <br /> Engineering Department completes their on-street parki g utilization analysis and the Planning <br /> Department completes their analysis of the redevelop r-nt potential. <br /> 7:33:29 PM <br /> Motion: Commissioner Olivers made a motion to i iate the process to review the code amendment as <br /> it relates to parking along the Hewitt corridor, eas if Broadway. Commissioner Sand seconded the <br /> motion. <br /> Chair Sosin asked if there were any questions. i.mmissioner Sand asked if there were any specific <br /> projects that initiated the request. Mr. Giffen -sponded no, and that Council President Gipson thought <br /> it would be helpful for business owners. <br /> Commissioner Sand stated that the size of , e project and the intensity of the change would have some <br /> affect as to the difficulty of releasing the r quirement for off-street parking. Mr.Giffen stated that he is <br /> relying on the City's Engineering Depart f -nt to complete their analysis before Commission is asked to <br /> • make any recommendation on the ame dment,that analysis should be completed. <br /> 7:35:22 PM <br /> Chair Sosin asked why the study are. as limited. Mr. Giffen responded that the request was to keep <br /> the amendment centered on Hewit, Avenue. Mr. Giffen referred to the graphic on the back of the <br /> memo to show what area is being • udied by the Engineering Department. <br /> Vote: Commissioner Jordison,y s; Commissioner Adams,yes; Commissioner Sand, yes; Commissioner <br /> Chase,yes; Commissioner Oliv: s,yes; Commissioner Murphy,yes; and Chair Sosin,yes. <br /> MotiortCarried. <br /> 7:36:42 PM <br /> Commissioner Olivers asked when the next meeting was scheduled. Mr. Koenig responded the first or <br /> third Tuesday in April. Chair Sosin stated that she would not be able to attend the meeting on April 3rd <br /> 7:38:46 PM •ADJOURNED. <br /> - r <br /> Planning Commissio, S: etary Date <br /> Kathy Davis,QXdministrative Assistant Date <br /> Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 10 <br /> March 6,2012 <br />