Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br /> 4. Is the proposed policy change consistent with other existing plan polices, or does it <br /> conflict with other plan policies? The extent to which the proposed policy change is <br /> consistent, or conflicts with, other existing policies should be explained in detail. <br /> Response: There were no inherent conflicts in the previous Parks and Recreation <br /> Element,nor have any conflicts been noted in the proposed new Element. As with the <br /> previous Element,Parks policies (now termed"strategies")reflect the current needs and <br /> directions of the community, as articulated through the Parks Commission,the City <br /> Administration and City Council. There is no indication in the new Parks and Recreation <br /> Element that its core objectives (now termed"policies")have changed. <br /> F. Correspondence received: <br /> Citizen email attached with response from Parks Director <br /> G. Planning Commission Recommendation: <br /> Adopt the revised Parks and Recreation Element to the Everett Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Correspondence(begins on next page): <br /> 3 <br /> 80 <br />