Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />3 <br />4 <br />5 <br />G <br />7 <br />8 <br />9 <br />10 <br />tl <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />1s <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />A9 <br />39 <br />zit) <br />41 <br />42 <br />4 <br />proposal, and authorised the county executive, through PIDS, to process Final Docket <br />XV9 consistent with chapters 30.73 and 30.74 SCC; and <br />WHEREAS, the Snohomish County Planning Commission ("planning <br />commissioW) was provided information on f=inal docket XVII, Including the EVR1 — City <br />of Everett proposal, in study sess€ons and tariefirqjs field on May 13, 2014, and <br />Septemlyar 9, 2014; and <br />WHEREAS, pursuant to chapter 30.14 SCC, PEAS completed Fibril review and <br />evaluation of Final Docket XV11, including the EVRI — City of Everett proposal, and <br />fmiarded recornmend.ations to the planning commission; and <br />WHEREAS, the planning commission held a public hearing and received pudic <br />testimony on Final Docket XV'll, including the EVR1— City of Everett proposal, on <br />October 7, 2014; and <br />WHEREAS, on October 14, 2014, the planning commission completed <br />deliberations on Find Docket Xtill, including the EVR1- City of Everett proposal, and <br />recommended adoption of they EVR1 — City of Everett proposal as enumerated In its <br />recommendation letter of Cacernber 4, 2014; and <br />WHEREAS, on May 13, 2015 and aentinued to June 10, 2015, the Snohomish <br />County Council Heid a public hearing, after proper notion, to hear publio testimony an <br />this ordinance and con,€der the entire record, Including the planning commission's <br />recommendation, on Final Docket XVII and dio EVR1—City ©f Everett proposal. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED: <br />Section 1. The county council makes the following findings: <br />A. The county council adapts and incorporates the foregoing recitals as findings as if <br />set foah fully herein, <br />B. The EVR1— City of Everett proposal would revise the SoLdiwest Urb2n GrovAh Area <br />(UGA) to add 21 acres of lana that will remain designated on th? Future Land Use <br />ft+lap (FLUNI) of fila General volley Plan (GPP) as R veiAvay Commercial f=armland <br />(RCF) and will remaln zoned Agriculture -10 Acre (A-10). Tile proposal would not <br />result in a net Incressa in rc*ndential or aniplayment 1,11, d- capac t+7. <br />C`. The EV R1 — City of Everett proposal site is vacant and located on ":.mith lslaiid, evest <br />of anion Slough and, east of Everest's sewage, treatment fa=cifity. Tile proposal site is <br />owned by the City of Ev rett, and is f�e1r}g li t d iC�r',�'�tfcand er han�semei:t and <br />restoration to rnitfgate impacts ftoni fu ! re expansion of Everest`s `aelwage treatment <br />rir:r�!rrF�f�rc�;io. ��-1s! <br />RELATING TO TKEi QRQ`N7i %-VIIL; AQ -3-l N ACT, DOP i ING <br />FUTURE 1 AtdG USE :,4At':.It4Ei4C►e1EilTS TU f IF 8'•1�JHG.'=ii5ri <br />CC, UNTY CSROWTH !kAINAGRIEN'i AUl` is0Mr—REL: TN -80A E PL rl, <br />NME,NDINLTi-I2ZONING MAP TO, IMPL T,"'E •i CKA.HGEsTO <br />JR((� Et.h:F��US==ELfiGir;{s ? E c!JT'dr°FLT <br />R Ai'€ ��f�4)�'ii! I'! A �G;A jF,/ 1 - CITY OF CVf E. iETi y -21 <br />P77e= 3 (.D 37 <br />