Laserfiche WebLink
Mary Cunningham <br /> From: Allan Giffen <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:48 PM <br /> To: Dave Koenig; Mary Cunningham; Jim Hanson <br /> Subject: FW: KC Property <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Charli McGourty <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:45 PM <br /> To: DL-Council; Allan Giffen <br /> Subject: FW: KC Property <br /> Another one I'm not sure you were copied on . . . <br /> Charli <br /> Original Message <br /> From: Margaret Lyman [mailto:marlymanPcomcast.net] <br /> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 6:58 AM <br /> To: Mayor Stephenson <br /> Subject: KC Property <br /> Dear Mayor Stephanson, <br /> After reading the complete text of Op ed piece in Sunday's Herald, I've concluded that <br /> proposal #3 is the better choice. After looking at the consultants' calculations about <br /> numbers of better paying jobs and improved public access, the Planning Department's <br /> recommended #4 falls short. This is an opportunity to bring to Everett the much coveted <br /> new look. Please take time to carefully consider all options closely and associated <br /> materials. <br /> the proximity of the KC shoreline property to our downtown core brings that opportunity to <br /> join the two within proposal #3. We have to look to our future and move past our heavy <br /> industrial toxic past. Proposal three brings much needed jobs, clean industries and public <br /> access. All things that will attract a younger professional crowd to move into Everett. <br /> I can now see the KC property from my apartment window and hope for a more healthy connection <br /> between my home and Everett's economic future. Proposition three, in my opinion, would bring <br /> that vision to reality. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Annie Lyman <br /> 2720 Hoyt Ave #201 <br /> Everett WA 98201 <br /> 1 <br />