10521 19TH PL W 2017-06-07 - Laserfiche WebLink

FI Felicia Medlen From: Mike Bramhall <MBramhall@case4n6.com> Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:52 AM To: Felicia Medlen Subject: RE: Kaile Fire Repair Got it. Thanks so much. Have a great weekend. Michael A. Bramhall, PE,SE, LEED®AP Senior Forensic Engineer I Vcard I Bio I Seattle Corporate Office tel.425.775.5550 x152 1 cell.206.718.1094 1 fax.425.775.0900 www.case4n6.com I Join our mailing list CASE Forensics Corporation-Consaitants,Architects,Scientists and Engineers From: Felicia Medlen [mailto:FMedlen@everettwa.gov] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:51 AM To: Mike Bramhall Subject: RE: Kaile Fire Repair Yes that is correct. If the deck were not present the patio could be eight feet.This was probably the case when the home was originally built, adding the deck put the depth of the patio out of compliance by acting as a cover. From: Mike Bramhall [mailto:MBramhall(-acase4n6.com] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:38 AM To: Felicia Medlen Subject: RE: Kaile Fire Repair Thanks for the prompt reply. I hadn't considered the impact of the upper deck on the lower deck. Is the six foot requirement on the lower deck because the upper deck is acting as a covering for the lower deck? This would then put it in the exception allowed by 39.150 C.9 right(as you have highlighted below)? Michael A. Bramhall, PE,SE, LEED®AP Senior Forensic Engineer I Vcard I Bio I Seattle Corporate Office tel.425.775.5550 x152 I cell.206.718.1094 1 fax.425.775.0900 www.case4n6.com I Join our mailing list CASE Forensics Corporation-Consultants,Architects,Scientists and Engineers From: Felicia Medlen [mailto:FMedlenCaaeverettwa.gov] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 9:34 AM To: Mike Bramhall Subject: RE: Kaile Fire Repair Mike, This can all be addressed in the permit review. I will make a note on the permit and the plans that state the roof covering the upper deck cannot be replaced because it is not in compliance with code. 1