My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3326
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 3326
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2017 10:11:10 AM
Creation date
6/22/2017 10:11:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
3326
Date
5/22/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' r F <br /> Craig Van Sant <br /> Appeal 11-89 <br /> Page -7- <br /> In Washington, the intent to abandon a non-conforming use is a question of <br /> fact for the trier of fact, Bartz vs. Board of Adjustment, 492 P.2d 1374, 80 <br /> Wn.2d 209. It must, however, be established that the non-conforming use <br /> existed before it can be determined if it was abandoned. No such use did <br /> exist for the non-conforming residential use of the subject property and, <br /> therefore, any multi-family residential use is contrary to the R-2 zoning <br /> designation and its allowed uses. <br /> Although a commercial non-conforming use may have existed on-site, it has been <br /> abandoned. The Washington Court of Appeals has decided that if a <br /> non-conforming use is abandoned or discontinued, the right to continue it <br /> comes to an end, Andrew vs. King County, 582 P.2d 509, 21 Wn.App. 566. <br /> Because the previous owner's activities were not continuous commercial <br /> activity, the commercial non-conforming use was discontinued and abandoned. <br /> There was not a commercial non-conforming use for the subject property. <br /> The issuance of the Certification of a Non-Conforming Use and Building for the <br /> property at 4228 South Third Avenue, Everett, Washington, was in error and <br /> should be withdrawn. <br /> Done and dated this 12th day of January, 1990. <br /> cnt-P0 414.4444!. <br /> James M. Driscoll <br /> Hearing Examiner <br /> The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing Examiner based <br /> on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It is final unless <br /> the following procedure is followed: <br /> 1. Any aggrieved party of record who has actively participated in the <br /> hearing before the Examiner may file a written request with the Examiner <br /> for reconsideration within ten (10) working days of the date of the <br /> Examiner's decision. The Examiner's mailing address is City Hall, 3002 <br /> Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA, 98201 and the location of the Examiner's <br /> office is 2731 Wetmore Building, 3rd floor. The request shall <br /> explicitly set forth alleged errors of procedure, fact or law. The <br /> Examiner shall act within ten (10) working days after the date of the <br /> filing of the request for reconsideration by either denying the request, <br /> issuing a revised decision or calling for an additional public hearing. <br /> If an additional hearing is required, notice of said hearing shall be <br /> mailed to all parties of record not less than five (5) working day prior <br /> to the hearing date. The final date for requesting reconsideration is <br /> January 29, 1990. <br /> 2. Within ten (10) working days after the Hearing Examiner's action on the <br /> request for reconsideration, the aggrieved party may file a written <br /> appeal with the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 3002 Wetmore Avenue, <br /> Everett, WA 98201. <br /> If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the Everett City Council <br /> for further consideration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.