Laserfiche WebLink
Craig Van Sant <br /> Appeal 11-89 <br /> Page -4- <br /> Accordingly, the decision of January 12, 1990, with regard to the commercial <br /> Non-Conforming Use of the subject property remains as set forth therein. <br /> There was not a commercial Non-Conforming Use for the property. Likewise, the <br /> Applicant has not adequately shown that there was an existing multi-family <br /> residential use on the subject property. Therefore, there is no <br /> non-conforming designation of the multi-family use for this property. As set <br /> forth in the January 12, 1990, decision, the proposed multi-family residential <br /> use is contrary to the R-2 zoning designation. <br /> Done and dated this 8th day of March, 1990. <br /> M es M. Driscoll <br /> The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing Examiner based <br /> on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It is final unless <br /> the following procedure is followed: <br /> 1. Within ten (10) working days (March 22, 1990,) after the Hearing <br /> Examiner's action on the request for reconsideration, the aggrieved <br /> party may file a written appeal with the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, <br /> 3002 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA 98201. <br /> If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the Everett City Council <br /> for further consideration. <br />