Laserfiche WebLink
Thomas Hoffman Appeal u 13 <br /> Appeal 9-89 <br /> Page -5- <br /> COMMENT S <br /> The subject property, a 3,000 square foot lot, was part of the parcel of land <br /> that was included in a deed recorded in Snohomish County on December 22, 1955 <br /> (Snohomish County Recording Number 1173641). What this effectively did was <br /> create contiguous lots that were acquired by a common conveyance before <br /> December 1, 1956. Separately these two lots do not satisfy minimum lot area <br /> and width standards for the City of Everett. Therefore, the lots must be <br /> considered merged. This decision is made pursuant to EMC 19.56.110.B. <br /> The Everett City Council was recently faced with merger issues for lots in <br /> Everett and enacted EMC 19.56.110.B. Such an enactment applied to all lots, <br /> including the Appellants. The City, obviously, was unaware of the Appellant's <br /> situation at the time of the enactment. <br /> It is understood that this creates a severe hardship for the Appellant. He <br /> obviously has been under the impression through tax assessments that he had <br /> two separate lots. He has saved for the necessary materials to build on the <br /> lot and now after acquiring all of the materials he has discovered that he <br /> does not qualify as a merged lot. <br /> Because of the inequities in this case, it is recommended that the Everett <br /> Planning Department meet with the Appellant for further discussion to <br /> determine if there is any other relief that can be applied to his case. The <br /> Appellant's intentions are noble and would benefit the neighborhood. However, <br /> they fly in the face of EMC 19.56.110.B. It is suggested that the Everett <br /> Planning Department try to work out some kind of resolution of this matter for <br /> the benefit of the Appellant. <br /> Done and dated this 30th day of January, 1990. <br /> IP-41a16t-A7 ' Lat <br /> James M. Driscoll <br /> Hearing Examiner <br /> The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing Examiner based <br /> on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It is final unless <br /> the following procedure is followed: <br /> 1. Any aggrieved party of record who has actively participated in the <br /> hearing before the Examiner may file a written request with the Examiner <br /> for reconsideration within ten (10) working days of the date of the <br /> Examiner's decision. The Examiner's mailing address is City Hall, 3002 <br /> Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA, 98201 and the location of the Examiner's <br /> office is 2731 Wetmore Building, 3rd floor. The request shall <br /> explicitly set forth alleged errors of procedure, fact or law. The <br /> Examiner shall act within ten (10) working days after the date of the <br /> filing of the request for reconsideration by either denying the request, <br /> issuing a revised decision or calling for an additional public hearing. <br /> If an additional hearing is required, notice of said hearing shall be <br /> 9 0 mailed to all parties of record not less than five (5) working day prior <br /> to the hearing date. The final date for requesting reconsideration is <br /> February 13, 1990. <br />