Resolution 3197 - Laserfiche WebLink

00000s Bay Ridge Development Order May 26, 1989 40 Page -7- 2. The witness submitted that the traffic situation on S.R. 527 is becoming problematic and decisions to add more traffic require careful consideration. She submitted that mitigation measures for this development are inadequate and recommended that the right-of-way for this highway be 100 feet. The traffic issues were addressed in the limited Environmental Impact Statement prepared for this project. The facts and figures and mitigation measures as set forth in the E.I.S. are not before the Hearing Examiner. The facts and figures are presumed to be correct. Any relief from the mitigation measures of the E.I.S. must be done through the administrative procedure provided in the State Environmental Policy Act. a- ... V. David Battle 1. The petitioner submitted a concurrence with the issues as set forth in the reconsideration request of the Silver Lake Action Committee. The petitioner also submitted that the site plan, as proposed by the Applicant, did not have adequate design, planning or documentation for the wet pond system within the site and its ability to retain large volumes of water. He submitted that with 54% of the area being an impervious surface, significant water will be retained during heavy rain storms. He contended that at least a one-half acre pond of at least two feet deep with grasslined swales for filtration purposes is required. Condition #17 addresses the treatment of storm water run-off on the site. This requirement mandates that wet ponds throughout the site be designed to provide for a minimum of 24 hours' detention for all storms up to, and including, a five year, 24 hour storm. This condition was submitted by the City of Everett's Planning Department after consultation with the Engineering Department and Public Works Department of the City of Everett. It is presumed that the City has adequately reviewed the potential flooding problems on-site and that this condition will adequately handle storm drainage. 2. The petitioner requested that a covenant be required prohibiting the development from having access via 23rd Drive S.E. No access is proposed to this site via 23rd Drive S.E. Any access through this street will be required to be reviewed by the City. Based on the presentation of the Planning Department, this access to the multi-family development through a single family residential street is highly unlikely. If access is, in fact, granted, the decision can be appealed through the administrative process of the City of Everett. 000043