Laserfiche WebLink
Pa ge 2 Cont. <br /> Jerry Ervine <br /> File No. SMA 9-86 (or SMA No . 982) <br /> species winter in the area. <br /> 7. Environmental Health a. Is "NONE" as adequate answer when <br /> the answer will depend upon what businesses locate on the site? <br /> 10. Aesthetics. What would the "Height of Structure" be if it <br /> includes a stack for an incinerator? <br /> Even though the proposed site may not be chosen for an incinerator <br /> protection of shoreline areas is a responsibility of the city and it <br /> would be right and proper, indeed neccessary, that your department <br /> request a Biological Evaluation of the area and insist that the 200f t. <br /> from the high water mark landward be left undisturbed by any future <br /> development. Otherwise a Determination of Significance should be <br /> issued and COE involvement requested. Also, your departments personal <br /> inspection and determination of wetland status of the site is important <br /> and I ask you to do this. <br /> I appreciate your time and consideration and thank you. <br /> S <br /> jt yr/ePhnfhT Sincerely, <br /> r7kY <br /> P/6111 4i-tin e apPb(a" <br /> l� ( Lr'1 // o <br /> �v : 7 <br /> cip 4,r <br /> 334/ C17/ <br /> ikt <br /> ry <br />