Laserfiche WebLink
Charlotte Seymour Appeal 1 <br /> Appeal 1-85 <br /> Page - 8 - <br /> It is suggested to the Appellant that this Decision be appealed <br /> to the Everett City Council . The Appellant has satisfied the <br /> general requirements for a Home Occupation Permit as set forth <br /> in the Conclusions of this document. The Appellant has , <br /> however , failed to satisfty the criteria for the specific <br /> requirements as set forth in Section 19.44 .030. An appeal to <br /> the Everett City Council would most adequately provide an <br /> interpretation of the legislative intent of Section 19 .44 .030 <br /> which sets forth the specific criteria for the approval of Home <br /> Occupation Permits. <br /> Done and dated this 4th day of June ( 1985. <br /> C�1 L 2 )7]. )j,j,GGG <br /> James M. Driscoll <br /> The decision on this application has been made by the Hearing <br /> Examiner based on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80 as <br /> amended. It is final unless the following procedure is <br /> followed: <br /> 1. An aggrieved party has filed a written request for <br /> reconsideration to the Hearing Examiner within ten (10) <br /> working days of the Hearing Examiner ' s decision. It is <br /> the discretion of the Hearing Examiner to grant or deny <br /> reconsideration. The final date for reconsideration is <br /> June 18 , 1985. <br /> 2. Within ten (10) working days after the Hearing <br /> Examiner ' s action on the reconsideration, the aggrieved <br /> party files a written appeal with the City Clerk ' s <br /> office. <br /> If appealed properly, the matter will be submitted to the <br /> Everett City Council for further consideration. <br /> 16 <br />