Laserfiche WebLink
2. If a development is proposed on or within a distance which could impact habitats of <br />primary association, significant biological areas, and/or vegetative corridors linking <br />watersheds, as described in this section, the applicant shall provide a habitat assessment. <br />If the habitat assessment determines that the proposed development could potentially <br />adversely impact a fish and wildlife habitat conservation area, the applicant shall provide <br />a habitat management plan (HMP), prepared by a qualified expert for evaluation by the <br />city, state and federal agencies. The HMP must address activities that can be taken to <br />preserve, protect, or enhance the affected fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas. The <br />HMP shall be based upon sound habitat management practices and be designed to <br />achieve specific habitat objectives. If the habitat assessment finds that the proposed <br />development could result in substantial elimination of or significant reduction in riparian <br />corridors, existing connections between critical areas, or continuous vegetated corridors <br />linking watersheds, the HMP must analyze alternatives and measures to maximize the <br />maintenance of existing corridors. The city shall ask the appropriate resource agencies to <br />review and comment on the development impacts and the provisions of the HMP. <br />a. Distance for Habitats of Primary Association. <br />i. Salmonids . When development is proposed on or within two hundred feet of a <br />Type F stream, a habitat assessment shall be required. <br />ii. Bald Eagles. When a development is proposed within eight hundred feet of an <br />eagle nest, or within one-half mile of a nest if also within two hundred fifty feet of <br />the shoreline, or within one-quarter mile of a communal roost, a habitat <br />assessment meeting the requirements of this chapter shall be required. In addition <br />to the requirements of this chapter, the habitat assessment shall address the <br />criteria contained in WAC 232-12-292, the Washington State Bald Eagle <br />Protection Rules. The director is authorized to promulgate an administrative rule <br />identifying the required content for an integrated habitat assessment consistent <br />with these requirements. <br />iii. Other Species. If habitats of primary association are identified for other species, <br />the director, after consulting with the Department of Fish and Wildlife, shall <br />determine the appropriate distance from a designated fish and wildlife habitat <br />conservation area which will require a habitat assessment or habitat management <br />plan. <br />b. Continuous Vegetative Corridors Linking Watersheds. If a development is proposed <br />within an area that provides a continuous vegetative corridor linking watersheds, a <br />habitat assessment is required. <br />c. Significant Biological Areas. If a development is proposed within three hundred feet <br />of a significant biological area, a habitat assessment is required. <br />is hereby amended to read as follows: <br />Additional fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas requirements. <br />A. Definitions. <br />1. Habitats of primary association" means a critical component(s) of the habitats of <br />federally or state -listed endangered, threatened, candidate, sensitive, and priority wildlife <br />or plant species which, if altered, may reduce the likelihood that the species will maintain <br />and reproduce over the long term. Habitats of primary association include, but are not <br />21 <br />