Laserfiche WebLink
1.5. The City shall pursue a moderate capital improvement program through a careful <br /> balance of moderate debt issuance and substantial pay-as-you-go capital projects. <br /> 1.6. Subject to federal and state law, interest may be capitalized from the date of issuance <br /> of debt obligations through the completion of construction for revenue producing <br /> projects. <br /> 1.7. The City shall not use debt to finance operating needs except in the case of an <br /> extreme financial emergency that is beyond its control or reasonable ability to forecast. <br /> 2. Limitations <br /> 2.1. The City shall seek to limit outstanding general obligation debt to a maximum of 75% <br /> of its statutory debt limit as set out in RCW 39.36.020. <br /> 2.2. Long-term debt will have a maximum maturity of the earlier of: 1)the estimated useful <br /> life of the projects financed; 2) thirty (30)years; or 3)the final maturity of debt <br /> obligations being refinanced, unless a longer term is recommended by the Council <br /> Budget and Finance Committee. <br /> 2.3. When appropriate,the City may choose to issue general obligation securities that pay <br /> a rate of interest that varies according to a pre-determined formula or results from a <br /> periodic remarketing of the securities. However, the City will avoid over use of <br /> variable-rate debt due to the potential volatility of such instruments. <br /> 2.4. The City will not engage in derivative instruments,such as interest rate swaps, due to <br /> the risk associated with those financial products. <br /> 3. Utility Debt <br /> 3.1. The City shall maintain a utility rate structure that preserves its revenue debt coverage <br /> ratio at no less than 2.0. <br /> 3.2. The City shall maintain an operating cash reserve balance in Utility Fund 401 of no <br /> less than 90 days of operating expenses, plus annual debt service requirements. <br /> 3.3. The City shall maintain a minimum capital cash balance in its construction fund equal <br /> to the six-year average of renewal and replacement projects for each Utility function. <br /> This average shall be based on annual depreciation for each Utility function. <br /> 3.4. The City will emphasize level debt service structures and avoid issuing variable rate <br /> instruments for Utility debt to maintain a predictable and manageable basis for long- <br /> term capital and utility rate planning. <br /> 4. Bond Issues <br /> 4.1. Every project proposed for financing should be accompanied by a full analysis of <br /> associated future operating and maintenance costs. <br /> 4.2. Prior to submitting a financing project to City Council for approval, Finance Department <br /> staff will undertake an analysis that examines the following: <br /> 2 I Page <br /> 3 <br />