Laserfiche WebLink
EVERETT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN <br />WHY NOT REQUIRE LOS D OR BETTER OPERATIONS EVERYWHERE? <br />A key question that often comes up is why the City's Transportation Element would reduce the LOS standard in <br />some places. The answers aren't simple. While the City is committed to mobility for all, there are practical <br />considerations related to: <br />• Cost: Maintaining LOS D operations would require tens of millions of dollars in additional capital <br />investment along busy corridors. Recognizing that this plan's project list is already at the limits the city <br />can reasonably afford over the next 20 years, achieving LOS D in these locations would be unaffordable. <br />• Right of way: Even if the City could find the funds to improve all corridors and intersections to LOS D <br />standards, there would be substantial right of way impacts. This would require widening projects that <br />would take property frontage, eliminate tree coverage, and require significant modifications to <br />intersections in downtown. <br />• Other modes: Similar to the right of way discussion, building the roadway network to provide LOS D <br />conditions during the peak hour would require substantial widening, which would impact how people <br />experience walking and biking in Everett. Additional traffic lanes mean longer pedestrian crossing <br />distances, less tree cover, and a higher stress bicycle network. <br />Growth Management Act requirements: The State's concurrency requirement means that the City must be able <br />to maintain its stated LOS policy in order to allow for development. Setting an LOS standard that is unrealistic <br />for the above reasons puts Everett in jeopardy of being able to permit development, even within the its growth <br />centers, which are intended to provide a more walkable, bike -able, transit accessible option for living and <br />working in Snohomish County. <br />TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 52 <br />