Laserfiche WebLink
l0-v coq <br /> C <br /> DESIGNuz FIELD RE1fP of <br /> - <br /> ORT <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 019 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 12/30/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> P W 1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather:Cloudy, 40's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0900/1000 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, E.I.T. <br /> Qj Site Plan(s) m %Density Test Summary Signature: jg �✓ � <br /> Attachments: Installation Records ❑ Other <br /> Reviewed By: ;ex <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner <br /> with Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 168 and 169. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 168: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted surficially loose and saturated material beneath the footing areas for Lot 168. Today, <br /> GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had removed most of the surficially loose and saturated <br /> material from the base of the lot area. While on-site, GeoDesign noted a few locations along the west side with <br /> approximately 3 inches of loose saturated material which was removed with a concrete rake while on-site. Penetration <br /> depths for the exposed footing subgrade were generally less than 2 inches. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed footing subgrade is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. <br /> GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose or saturated material that may build up under the footing area be <br /> removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 169: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted surficially loose and saturated material beneath the footing areas for Lot 169. Today, <br /> GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had removed most of the surficially loose and saturated <br /> material from the base of the lot area. While on-site, GeoDesign noted that the southeast corner of the foundation area was <br /> submerged with approximately 3 inches of underlying loose soil. GeoDesign recommends that the southeast corner of the <br /> foundation area be dewatered and loose material removed with a shovel and/or concrete rake prior to the placement of <br /> concrete. Penetration depths for the exposed footing subgrade were generally less than 2 inches. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. John Feltner with Polygon was notified of our <br /> observations prior to our departure from the site. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services. We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents.our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as Indicated by Initials In the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 1 Seattle,WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 <br />