Ordinance 1729-90 - Laserfiche WebLink

f 1 1 transcribing the record and shall bear the costs of transcription. is hereby amended to read: G. Judicial Review. Any review of a final action of the City, which action was reviewed by the City's Land Use Hearing Examiner, must be reviewed by the Everett City Council in accordance with the review procedures provided in Section 2 .23 of the Everett Municipal Code, prior to any judicial review. All judicial reviews of these actions shall be reviewed in accordance with the requirements for judicial review set forth in Section 2 . 23 of the Everett Municipal Code. Any final action of the City under this Ordinance which is not reviewed by the City's Land Use Hearing Examiner shall be final and conclusive unless within thirty (30) days from the final date of the City's final action an aggrieved party formally makes application to the court to ohtain a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for Snohomish County for purposes of review of the action taken. For purposes of the writ proceedings, the petitioner shall be responsible for the costs of transcription of the record and all costs associated with the preparation of the record. SECTION 31: Subsection 42.020 of Ordinance No. 1671-89, which reads: 41.020 Multiple Review Processes. In the event that a proposed development requires more than one review process, the applications shall be reviewed concurrently, as set forth in the pertinent land use regulations (Hearing Examiner Ord. , Subdivision Ord. , etc. ) . is hereby amended to read: 41.020 Multiple Review Processes. In the event that a proposed use or development requires more than one review process, the applications shall he reviewed by only one Review Authority to the extent permitted by City Ordinances. Proposals which this Ordinance or other City Ordinances require_ review using hoth Review Processes TT and TTT shall hP reviewed using only Review Process TTT : proposals which this Ordinance or other City Ordinances require review using both Review Processes TTT and V shall he reviewed using only Review Process V; proposals which this Ordinance or other City Ordinances require review using both Review Processes TT and V shall hP reviewed using only Review Process V. Tn the event that the proposal may not he reviewed using a single review process, the applications shall be reviewed concurrently, as set forth in the pertinent land use regulations (Hearing Examiner Ord. , Subdivision Ord. , etc. ) . When review processes are combined, the evaluation criteria required to he used by the Review Authority for a single review process shall still he applied by the higher Review Authority in evaluating a proposal with combined review processes. SECTION 32: It is expressly the purpose of this ordinance to provide for and promote the health, safety and welfare of the general public and not to create or otherwise establish or designate any particular class or group of persons who will or should be especially protected or benefitted by the terms of this ordinance.