My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3000 41ST ST 2023-05-17
>
Address Records
>
41ST ST
>
3000
>
3000 41ST ST 2023-05-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/17/2023 8:43:16 AM
Creation date
10/26/2017 10:46:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
41ST ST
Street Number
3000
Notes
OVERLOOK AT RIVERFRONT
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• • <br /> G EO DE S GN_ FIELD REPORT <br /> 1 of 3 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 153 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 8/29/2019 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> 0, <br /> Randy Allen(City of Everett) Michelle Dittman(Polygon) Weather: Sunny, 70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Amy Pickett(Superior Concrete) Arrival/Departure: 1400/1500 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Kyler Meek(Polygon) • <br /> Stephen Farnan(Polygon) Prepared By: Aubrey Hodgins <br /> Attachments: <br /> m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature T�❑ Installation Records ❑ Other <br /> Reviewed B <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Aubrey Hodgins, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe foundation subgrade for Lots 347, 348 and 349. <br /> Lots 347, 348 and 349: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the foundation and crawl space area for Lots 347, 348 and <br /> 349. We noted that the exposed foundation subgrade generally consisted of a gray silty SAND with gravel that could be <br /> probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. No over-excavation was necessary for Lots 347, 348 or <br /> 349. <br /> Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; in-place <br /> density tests indicated that the exposed material had been generally compacted to 95%to 99% of its maximum dry density <br /> as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is our opinion that the exposed foundation subgrade observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. The contractor was notified of our <br /> observations prior to our departure from the site. <br /> W <br /> kS—OC` oOS <br /> aLkoo sT <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.