Laserfiche WebLink
nap ° <br /> Pete*met,AtA.i.EED AP <br /> Pfaject Manager <br /> /,,lri_Atxrr a•tiy.=fl7stMui::f%lt"eql <br /> 502 W R'v'erside suite 2VAD <br /> Sp kerne WA 99291 USA <br /> (om)32$6464 <br /> i,xr.ro.raMar 4Vra,eYou,4aa+ <br /> From: Dennis Titus [mailto:DennisT@cgengineering.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 2:44 PM <br /> To: Peter Kanyer <br /> Subject: RE: USP Dual Spec Product Table <br /> I talked to the USP rep and he said that there is no difference in load capacity if you were to use their product. USP uses <br /> rolled steel to make this connector and Simpson uses sheet steel. I don't know exactly how it works but there is <br /> difference in how the sheet steel accepts the zinc coating which might be why it affects the capacity. I recommend using <br /> the USP C88 with the 17 protection. <br /> Dennis Titus,PE,SE I Structural Engineer <br /> 250 4th Ave S Ste 200,Edmonds,WA 98020 <br /> p.425.778.8500 I f.425.778.5536 <br /> ww.c:en:ineerin•.com/n <br /> From: Peter Kanyer[mailto:kanyer@nystromolson.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday,September 21, 2016 12:08 PM <br /> To: Dennis Titus<DennisT@cgengineering.com> <br /> Subject: FW: USP Dual Spec Product Table <br /> Dennis, <br /> Thoughts on this? Can you please provide direction on preferred path forward? <br /> Thanks, <br />