My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance 1436-88
>
Ordinances
>
Ordinance 1436-88
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/2/2018 10:54:34 AM
Creation date
1/2/2018 10:54:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
1436-88
Date
1/27/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> • <br /> Planning Commission Minutes <br /> July 7, 1987 <br /> Page 2 <br /> considered quiet. Mr. Morton gave examples of noise levels are rustling leaves - 20 dBA, a <br /> car traveling on a street - 50 dBA, normal conversation - 50-60 dBA, an air conditioner - 60 <br /> dBA, a dishwasher - 75 dBA, a vacuum cleaner - 70 dBA. <br /> All these noise measurements were substantiated by Gary Doughty and I strongly recommend <br /> that we don't deviate from those standards. <br /> Ernst Staudt asked Mr. Morton what the area being surveyed looked like. Ray Morton stated <br /> that the area was wide open. Bill Strong had told the group that trees do not serve as a <br /> buffer against noise. Alders particularly do not protect against noise. <br /> Sharon Demuth, 3323 - 52nd Place S.W., Everett, WA then addressed the Planning <br /> Commission, stating that she is a biologist by vocation, but her topic this evening was <br /> drainage. I have lived in the area for approximately seven years. Ms. Demuth stated that <br /> most of the water slopes down and goes down into Powdermill Gulch in a very rapid manner. <br /> "There is essentially no drainage on the top of the hill. The water table is right at the <br /> surface level of the soil back there. Therefore, any water that hits runs off of the clay and <br /> sand there. The high water table is something that Mr. Bocek is going to have to deal with in <br /> developing the area. With construction going on, all of that water being generated will go <br /> quickly to the Gulch. The sides are unstable. If the present state of growth is disturbed, this <br /> will create a an aggravated erosion problem. Repairing the bridge over Edgewater canyon is <br /> something which has to be considered with any of this construction. If the trees and other <br /> foliage there are maintained that will be the biggest help." There was a discussion of <br /> tightlining and Mrs. Demuth stated that tightlining may or may not work depending on <br /> whether there are adequate measures taken to take huge a increase in the volume of water - <br /> flash flood. There are 105 acres in this parcel and 90% of the drainage goes directly into <br /> Powder Mill Gulch." <br /> There is pollution in the creek with petroleum/hydrocarbons presently there and with higher <br /> use, it will get worse. <br /> Don Berg, 3322 - 52nd Place S.W., Everett, WA told the Planning Commission that the <br /> committee he was on reviewed the zoning codes of nearby communities such as Redmond, <br /> Bellevue and Renton looking at their transition zones which is what we have here - residential <br /> to business park. They had considered noise, visual impact, overview. This is basically why <br /> we have come up with the idea of the berm and included a 150-foot buffer, the request for a <br /> 200-foot building setback. We think the height limitations are reasonable. We hope the City <br /> will give our proposal serious thought. <br /> Gary Doughty stated that after reviewing the written draft proposal and meeting with the <br /> neighborhood on July 1, the staff reviewed the proposal in house and feel it is a was very good <br /> proposal. The group had worked very hard to come up with this new solution very recently. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.