Laserfiche WebLink
, � • • <br /> ! z FIELD REPORT <br /> _� �� ,.w �, ti.__� .�..,...���,. . <br /> 1 of 4 <br /> s Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson r RepOt't: 032 � <br /> � <br /> GeoDesi n# Pol on-1 <br /> � g : yg 27 03 _ < _ Date o4 � <br /> . /28/20'17 <br /> ,__ __ _ _.. ___ _..._ _ : <br /> -- __ _ __ _ <br /> a Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: � <br /> > PW1505-005 <br /> � <br /> � Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) �� \Weather. Clear, 50�S �� �e� <br /> � Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1645/1715 � <br /> � Distribution: � <br /> � Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> s __ _ � <br /> � . : <br /> � Paul N1cKee(City of Everett) ' Dave Foster(City of Everett) Pr2pdCeC� By: Be� Welllb8fg � <br /> : � Site Plan(s) ❑ Density Test Summary Signature: �,�--� ��'�~�- � <br /> Attachments: _ _ _ _ _ _ _. <br /> ❑ Installation Records � Other Reviewed By � <br /> wNe __ � �� a,�,...... . .. .__ _ _. ._.... __.eti n .. � <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 224 and 225. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 224: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 224. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown silty SAND <br /> with gravel (previously placed loose surcharge material)which could be probed 3 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe <br /> across the entire lot area. GeoDesign noted the PVC pipe associated with a settlement marker from Phase 2 (SM-23) <br /> which appeared to s±ill be buried approximately 3 feet. <br /> GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS and the client that the lot area is currently unsuitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that the loose surcharge material be removed down to firm and unyielding material and <br /> replaced with structural fill material. <br /> Lot 225: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 225. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown silty SAND <br /> with gravel (previously placed loose surcharge material)which could be probed up to 3 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil <br /> probe. Material along the north side of the lot could be probed approximately 6 inches, 1 to 1.5 feet along the center, and <br /> 2.5 to 3 feet along the south side. <br /> GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS and the client that the lot area is currently unsuitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that the loose surcharge material be removed down to firm and unyielding material and <br /> replaced with structural fill material. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Photo Log. <br /> This report prezents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on Ihe contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications(hroughout the duration of the proje�t irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work dces not indude supervizion or direction of the contraetor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our frm is not responzible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary remmmendations. The report can only 6e mnsidered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesi9n projea rnana9er,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'seaion. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br /> r <br /> L� � <br /> � <br />