Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> • <br /> individual approvals or decisions. The threshold determination and <br /> the EIS, if required, should ideally be completed at the beginning of <br /> this process. The threshold determination and the EIS (if required) <br /> should be completed at the earliest point in the planning and <br /> decision making process, at which time, principal features of a <br /> proposal and its environmental impacts can be reasonably identified. <br /> B. To the fullest extent possible, the procedures required by this <br /> Ordinance shall be integrated with existing planning and licensing <br /> procedures utilized by the City. These procedures should be <br /> initiated early, and undertaken in conjunction with other <br /> governmental operations to avoid lengthy time delays and unnecessary <br /> duplication of effort. <br /> C. A private applicant may, and is encouraged to, file a completed <br /> environmental checklist prior to the filing of an application for a <br /> license. The City shall provide for applicant review at the <br /> conceptual stage of a proposed action. An applicant shall submit a <br /> preliminary site plan in conjunction with a completed environmental <br /> checklist for SEPA review at the conceptual stage. <br /> If the Responsible Official determines that the information initially <br /> supplied is not reasonably sufficient to evaluate the environmental <br /> impacts of the proposal, further information may be required of the <br /> applicant in conformance with WAC 197-11-100 and WAC 197-11-335. <br /> D. At a minimum, the threshold determination and any required EIS shall <br /> be completed prior to the City making any decision irreversibly <br /> committing itself to adopt, approve or otherwise undertake any <br /> proposed non-exempt action. <br /> E. For non-exempt proposals, the final DNS or final EIS for the proposal <br /> shall accompany the City's final staff recommendation to any <br /> appropriate advisory body, such as the Planning Commission provided, <br /> however, that preliminary discussions or public workshops before the <br /> advisory body may occur prior to the final SEPA determinations. <br /> F. When the City is the proponent for either a governmental action of a <br /> project nature or a governmental action of a non-project nature, and <br /> the City is also the lead agency, then the maximum time limits <br /> contained in this ordinance for the threshold determination and EIS <br /> process shall not apply to the proposal. <br /> Section IIF: ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS IN TIME LIMITS APPLICABLE TO THE <br /> SEPA PROCESS <br /> The Responsible Official shall make the following <br /> determinations as part of the initial review of every <br /> non-exempt project or proposal, subject to the specified time <br /> limits which shall be applicable to private projects and to <br /> those governmental proposals submitted to the City by other <br /> agencies: <br /> 1. Categorical exemptions. A determination whether the <br /> project or proposal is categorically exempt shall be made <br /> by the Responsible Official within seven days of <br /> receiving a request for such a determination from a <br /> private applicant or another governmental agency. <br /> -8- <br />