My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3410 TERMINAL AVE 2018-03-09
>
Address Records
>
TERMINAL AVE
>
3410
>
3410 TERMINAL AVE 2018-03-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2018 4:05:53 PM
Creation date
2/9/2018 11:46:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TERMINAL AVE
Street Number
3410
Notes
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INCLUDED
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
M&N 8415-02 <br /> February 18,2015 As-Built Pile Axial Capacity and Soil Stiffness Memorandum <br /> stiffness that was assumed in design,therefore the design calculations for the mobile harbor crane loads <br /> are unaffected by any softening of the pile springs. <br /> For the load combinations using 1000 psf uniform live load,the maximum factored pile loads for all of the <br /> new piles and the existing piles on gridlines A and B were less than 390 kips.This indicated that for these <br /> piles a 2000 kip/in soil spring was still appropriate. However,the existing piles on gridlines C, D, E, F, G, <br /> and H had maximum factored axial loads that exceeded 390 kips, indicating that a reduced soil spring <br /> value was required. For these piles,the soil spring stiffness was taken to be 500 kips/in. <br /> The linear-elastic finite element analytical model used in design was updated to reflect these as-built soil <br /> spring values. The analysis showed that using these soil stiffness values, the existing pile cap was <br /> overloaded by 13 percent in positive flexure between gridlines C and D, and overloaded by 6 percent in <br /> positive flexure between gridlines E and G.The factored moment diagram envelopes for all of the existing <br /> pile caps are shown in Figure 1 below.Note that this analysis uses the elastic moment diagram to estimate <br /> the demands at the ultimate limit state. <br /> 3000.0 I I 1 I <br /> I I I I <br /> 2000.0 <br /> 1000.0 —_ — I *,, <br /> " ,• <br /> I I I <br /> 4.1 <br /> E -1000.0 i r- <br /> 0 <br /> I I I I <br /> 2 I I I <br /> -2000.0 <br /> I I I I <br /> I I I I I <br /> -3000.0 L L _L_ <br /> I I I I I <br /> I I I I I <br /> -4000.0 I I <br /> 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 <br /> Length along Member(ft) <br /> Max Moment --Min Moment Positive Capacity Negative Capacity <br /> Figure 1—Existing Pile Cap Flexural Demands <br /> Because inelastic action is allowed to occur at the ultimate limit state,ACI 318-08 Section 8.4 allows the <br /> redistribution of moments in continuous flexural members. Section 8.4.1 states "it shall be permitted to <br /> decrease factored moments calculated by elastic theory at sections of maximum negative or maximum <br /> positive moment in any span of continuous flexural members for any assumed loading arrangement by <br /> mot fat? & plchol 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.