Laserfiche WebLink
From: Meg Haley [mailto:MHaley©everettwa.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:38 PM <br /> To: Mark Payne <br /> Subject: RE: Corrections letter for M1702-015 2725 WETMORE AVE <br /> Hi Mark, <br /> We ask everyone for the same thing, which is the completed economizer section of the WSEC mechanical <br /> summary, attached, plans which indicate the existing and new RTU (I did not see plans submitted) and <br /> engineering review for any unit over 400 pounds. There is no indication that the unit had been reviewed <br /> structurally before. Please call me if you have additional questions. <br /> Meg <br /> Meg Haley, RA <br /> Plan Review Architect <br /> Permit Services, City of Everett, WA <br /> Direct: 425-257-8813 <br /> Front Counter. 425-257-8810 (Option 8) <br /> Permits everettwa.gov/permits Building Codes everettwa.gov/codes Addressing Questions everettwa.gov/maptools <br /> From: Mark Payne [mailto:mark(aessmwa.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 2:26 PM <br /> To: Meg Haley <br /> Subject: RE: Corrections letter for M1702-015 2725 WETMORE AVE <br /> Meg, <br /> I'm not sure what you need per your letter: <br /> The unit meets Tier 1.for efficiency (I included the AHRI sheet) and has an economizer(I included the manufacture cut <br /> sheet showing it had a code compliant low leak economizer) -so no exemption required. <br /> The new unit weighs a total of 23 lbs more than the unit it is replacing. While the old and new units weigh in excess of <br /> 400 lbs the weight difference is less than 5%- is a engineer stamp (about$500-$1,200 additional to the customer) <br /> NECESSARY? <br /> Please advise, <br /> Mark Payne <br /> Commercial Energy Consultant <br /> Essmwa.com <br /> 2120 Pacific Avenue <br /> Everett, WA. 98201 <br /> Office: (425) 252—3114 Fax: (425) 259—6660 <br /> http://www.essmwa.com <br /> 3�y <br />