Laserfiche WebLink
DESIGNzu FIELD REPORT"�'-­­, <br /> 1 Of 3. V111, <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 022 023 <br /> GeoDesign#: I Polygon-127-03 Date: 01/26/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PAW 15505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) I Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather:Cloudy, 40's <br /> — <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0815/0915 <br /> Distribution: f --- <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Joe Dapeevich <br /> m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> Attachments: ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Joe Dapcevich, was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner with <br /> Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 134 and 141. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 141: <br /> Hand probing the foundation subgrade surface with a 1/2" diameter steel foundation rod indicated approximately 2" of <br /> surficially loose and saturated material and areas of shallow standing water(approximately 1"deep). We continue to <br /> recommend removing the water and surficially saturated material prior to pouring of footings. GeoDesign identified one <br /> area along the north perimeter which could be probed 1 to 1.5 feet. GeoDesign recommended over-excavating the area <br /> 1.5'and line it with non-woven geotextile material and backfilled with 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material <br /> compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. Relative compaction of the exposed footing subgrade material was tested <br /> using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge. In-place density tests indicated that the footing subgrade material had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> Lot 134: <br /> Hand probing the foundation subgrade surface with a 1/2"diameter steel foundation rod indicated approximately 2"of <br /> surficially loose and saturated material and areas of shallow standing water(approximately 1"deep). We continue to <br /> recommend removing the water and surficially saturated material prior to pouring of footings. GeoDesign identified one <br /> area along the north perimeter which could be probed 1 to 1.5 feet. GeoDesign recommended over-excavating the area <br /> 1.5'and line it with non-woven geotextile material and backfilled with 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material <br /> compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. Relative compaction of the exposed footing subgrade material was tested <br /> using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge. In-place density tests indicated that the footing subgrade material had been <br /> compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> A summary of density tests taken and observations can be found in the attached Figure 1 &2 and Nuclear Density Gauge <br /> Data. John Feltner and Eddy Stevens with Polygon were notified of our observations prior to our departure from the site. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative, Ourwork does not Include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our f rm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as Indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 1 Seattle,WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 <br />