Laserfiche WebLink
qq fic 30� pt, 'M <br /> CST' • DESIGN? FIELD REPORT <br /> 1 of 3 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 024 <br /> GeoDesign#: j Polygon-127-03 Date: 01/27/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Cloudy, 40's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1030/1100 <br /> Distribution: — - - --- — — -- -- <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) 1630/1700 <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> Attachments: m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary _ Signature: — r✓ <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner with <br /> Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 134 and 141. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 141: <br /> Previously for Lot 141, GeoDesign noted an area which could be probed 1 to 1.5 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe <br /> which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding soil,then lined with a non-woven geotextile material, and <br /> backfilled with 2 inch railroad ballast material compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. We also noted surficially loose <br /> and saturated material which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding ground. Today, GeoDesign <br /> observed the foundation excavation subcontractor remove surficially loose and saturated material and over-excavate the <br /> previously identified areas down to material which could be probed less than 1 inch. GeoDesign noted that the contractor <br /> lined the base of the over-excavated area with a non-woven geotextile material prior to backfilling with a 2-inch railroad <br /> ballast material. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area is currently suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material which may build up under the foundation <br /> subgrade area should be removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> Lot 134: <br /> Previously for Lot 134, GeoDesign noted an area which could be probed 1 to 1.5 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe <br /> which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding soil, then lined with a non-woven geotextile material, and <br /> backfilled with 2 inch railroad ballast material compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. We also noted surficially loose <br /> and saturated material which we recommended be removed down to firm and unyielding ground. Today, GeoDesign <br /> observed the foundation excavation subcontractor remove surficially loose and saturated material and over-excavate the <br /> previously identified areas down to material which could be probed less than 1 inch. GeoDesign noted that the contractor <br /> lined the base of the over-excavated area with a non-woven geotextile material prior to backfilling with a 2-inch railroad <br /> ballast material. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area is currently suitable for support of the intended load. <br /> GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material which may build up under the foundation <br /> subgrade area should be removed prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Figure 2. John Feltner with Polygon was notified <br /> of our observations prior to our departure from the site. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction oft he contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 1 Seattle,WA 98133 1 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 1 253.203.0095 <br />