2102 ROSS AVE 2018-02-23 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable economic use of the property is not the result of actions by the applicant in subdividing the property or adjusting a boundary line, thereby creating the undevelopable conditions after the effective date of this article. 5. The proposal mitigates the impacts on the environmentally sensitive areas to the maximum extent possible. Conditional Use 1. That the proposed use is consistent with the policies of RCW 90.58.020 and Everett's Shoreline Master Program. 2. That the use will not interfere with the normal public use of public shorelines. 3. That the use of the site and design of the project will be compatible with other authorized uses in the area and with uses planned for the area under the comprehensive plan and Shoreline Master Program. 4. That the proposed use will cause no significant adverse effects to the shoreline environment in which it is to be located. 5. That the public interest suffers no substantial detrimental effect. CONCLUSIONS BASED ON FINDINGS 1. The Applicant requested approval of a Shoreline Permit, Conditional Use and a RUE for a project to be completed at 2102 Ross Avenue, Everett, Washington. The proposed project includes an addition of a 5,280 square foot wharf; a 12,650 square foot staging area; a 12,750 square foot office and shop building that would be added to an existing 45,000 square foot steel fabrication and storage facility; and reduction of a shoreline buffer through a reasonable use process. (finding 1) 2. The SMP designations for the subject property are Urban Mixed Industrial for the upland portion of the site and Aquatic Conservancy for the portion of the site that fronts the Snohomish River. The proposed uses are allowed in both these zones. (finding 4) 3. The proposal is subject to shoreline review. It is the intent of the Applicant to combine the subject property with the adjoining property for a continued operation of a steel fabrication facility. (findings 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12) 3. The relevant sections of the SMP for the instant request were identified. (finding 15) 4. The regulation requiring protection of archaeological interest uncovered during excavation or development has adequately been addressed. (finding 29) 5. The entire site is within a zone "AE" as designated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map. A Floodplain Development Permit will be required. (finding 24) 11;