Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> 23. The Shoreline Permit will contain provisions that require the Applicant to <br /> immediately stop work and notify the City and the Tulalip Tribes if anything of <br /> possible archaeological interest is uncovered during excavations or development. <br /> If such an event occurs, the Applicant will be required to consult a professional <br /> archaeologist to inspect and evaluate the site. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 2; <br /> testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 24. The entire site is within a zone "AE" as designated on the Flood Insurance Rate <br /> Map. A Floodplain Development Permit will be required to assure that the new <br /> building will be placed a minimum of two feet above the 100-year flood elevation. <br /> (exhibit 1, staff report, page 3) <br /> 25. The project is in an area that is included within the City of Everett's shoreline <br /> public access plan. The adopted plan, that includes the site, calls for a pathway <br /> along Ross Avenue that would be developed instead of a trail along the <br /> shoreline. In lieu of constructing the pathway, the City is requiring the Applicant <br /> to pay a fee of 2% of the construction cost of the proposed development. <br /> (exhibit 1, staff report, page 3; testimony of Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 26. The proposed building height will be less than 35 feet, and the placement and <br /> design of the structure will be done in a manner that is least detrimental to <br /> shoreline views and vistas. (exhibit 1, staff report, pages 3 and 4; testimony of <br /> Mr. Ingalsbe) <br /> 27. The Conservancy Element includes regulations relating to development activities <br /> in environmentally sensitive areas. A Critical Areas Report was developed by <br /> David Evans and Associates, Inc. that documented the presence of critical areas, <br /> including a Category II wetland along the edge of the Snohomish River. The City <br /> determined that the identified critical areas and their buffers must be mitigated. <br /> (exhibit 1, staff report, page 4; exhibit 4, critical areas report) <br /> 28. The site is within the area that the City has mapped as being a liquefaction <br /> hazard area, and any impact resulting from this would have to be addressed at <br /> the time of building permit application. (exhibit 1, staff report, page 4) <br /> 29. Included in the regulations and controls that the City recommended were: water <br /> quality monitoring during construction; prohibition of any ecological impacts to <br /> water quality, quantity, or flows; land clearing, grading, filling and alteration of <br /> natural drainage features be limited to the minimum necessary for the permitted <br /> development; correct mitigation sequence; planting within environmentally <br /> sensitive areas and required buffers be native species or native hybrids; and <br /> buffers be maintained to eliminate non-native species. (exhibit 1, staff report, <br /> pages 4, 5, 10 and 11) <br /> 7 <br />