My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 7223
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 7223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2018 9:34:57 AM
Creation date
3/5/2018 9:34:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
7223
Date
2/28/2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
King County Metro has not found peak fares to significantly alter demand, and will consider whether to <br /> eliminate peak pricing entirely or move to time-based peak fares, which would be much easier to design <br /> and implement in Next Generation ORCA. Although King County Metro is currently the only agency with <br /> peak fares, other agencies have expressed interest in keeping the option open for future consideration. <br /> While eliminating peak fares may have a relatively moderate impact on fare revenue, implementing a <br /> change from trip-based peak to time-based peak is not expected to impact revenue. Any change will <br /> require coordination with bus operators and outreach to customers. <br /> 3.2.3.Fare Innovation—Fare Capping <br /> Forum participants were asked to consider a system design for Next Generation ORCA that would <br /> replace the current ORCA passes with "fare capping." Customers under a fare capping program would <br /> pay for each trip using E-purse value, but once a pre-defined cap (or limit) is reached,the remainder of <br /> the customer trips at the corresponding fare level would be "free." Fare capping's pay-as-you-go scheme <br /> would offer customers the benefits of a) not having to pay the up-front cost of a period pass and b) <br /> being guaranteed they will pay the optimal fare for their trips.The caps would be variable based on the <br /> cost of the transit services used and could be set for both daily and monthly accumulations to match <br /> current ORCA pass discounts. <br /> The three options considered for fare capping were the following: <br /> • Do not pursue fare capping(no change to fare structure) <br /> • Adopt full fare capping <br /> • Include fare capping framework in the requirements and design of the new ORCA system <br /> Recommendation: Do Not Pursue Fare Capping in Initial System Design <br /> The consensus recommendation was to not pursue fare capping at this time. An assessment of the <br /> Puget Sound region's fare complexity was performed compared with the fare structures of other transit <br /> agency peers considering or implementing fare capping. Given the numerous fares, passenger types, <br /> and pricing levels that the Next Generation ORCA system must support, it would be complex and costly <br /> to implement as well as highly challenging for customers to understand. Fare capping would also be <br /> expected to have a large negative impact on agency revenue. Finally, including fare capping in the <br /> requirements for the new fare system would limit the number of vendors who could demonstrate <br /> implementation experience and feasibly bid on the project. While it was determined that fare capping <br /> should not be pursued at this time, the Next Generation ORCA system will be designed in a flexible <br /> manner so that it will not preclude the introduction of fare capping and other innovative fare strategies <br /> for future phases of fare system development. <br /> Regional Fare Forum Summary Report 3/21/2017 Page 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.