Laserfiche WebLink
1 Gl?V?-CPI <br /> 4)9). Z� /9vrL 2 - <br /> GEI ' DESIGN FIELD REPORT <br /> Project Name: 3 Everett River Front Simpson Report 033 <br /> GeoDesign# ! Polygon-127-03 Date: 05/01/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) ' Weather Clear, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1000/1030 <br /> Distribution:i <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) 1630/1715 <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) j Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> t Attachments: <br /> DO Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary ? Signature: - '� <br /> - - _.._ ._...___._ <br /> ❑ Installation Records m Other Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 211,212, and 226. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 211: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had backfilled the previously over-excavated area on the west 2/3 of Lot 211 with a <br /> 2-inch railroad ballast material that was compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. Itis the opinion of GeoDesign that the <br /> foundation subgrade is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. <br /> Lot 212: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had backfilled the previously over-excavated area on Lot 212 with a 2-inch railroad <br /> ballast material that was compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation <br /> subgrade is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. <br /> Lot 226: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had excavated the foundation and crawl-space area for Lot 226. During our morning <br /> site visit, GeoDesign observed an area along the west side of Lot 226 which would require 1 to 1.5 feet of over-excavation <br /> down to firm and unyielding material. DDS had over-excavated the previously identified area down to firm and unyielding <br /> material. During our afternoon site visit, GeoDesign noted and identified material along the north and east side of Lot 226 <br /> which could be probed 6-12 inches. <br /> Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade material was tested using a Troxler 3430 Moisture-Density gauge. <br /> In-place density tests indicated that the material along the west and south side of Lot 226 had been compacted to greater <br /> than 95%of its maximum dry density. Material along the north and east side of Lot 226 had been compacted to less than <br /> 95%of its maximum dry density. GeoDesign notified the client that the area(marked in orange paint)would require <br /> over-excavation down to firm and unyielding material <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests can be found in the attached Figure 1, Nuclear Density Gauge Data,and <br /> Photo Log. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 "" <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />