4421 29TH AVE SE 2018-03-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

LL 1 Z St 10 CEO DES1GNZ FIELD REP IRT Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 003 GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 10/27/2016 Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: PW 1505-005 ` V31kd1.- 69 Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Rain,50's Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1745/1820 Distribution: Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By; Ben Weinberg, E.I.T. m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: Attachments: 0 Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner with Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade from Lots 123 and 124. SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: Lot 124: Upon arrival,GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had backfilled the previously over-excavated area on the west side of Lot 124 with permeable ballast material compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade material for the east side of the site was generally covered with approximately 2 to 3 inches of loose and saturated material. GeoDesign recommended that the surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the foundation subgrade area so in-place density tests could be taken. Lot 123: GeoDesign noted that the foundation area had been de-watered and that the foundation excavation subcontractor had over-excavated the previously identified west side of the lot down 12 to 18 inches. Penetration depths encountered for the exposed material was less than 3 inches. GeoDesign notified the client that the over-excavated area was suitable to backfill with permeable ballast material. GeoDesign noted that the foundation subgrade material for the east side of the site was generally covered with approximately 2 to 3 inches of loose and saturated material. GeoDesign recommended that the surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the foundation subgrade area so in-place density tests could be taken. A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative,Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095