Laserfiche WebLink
241°' DK S6 to 2 <br /> GEO <br /> DESIGN. FIELD •. ° • c. <br /> 1 0'3 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report 005 <br /> GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 10/31/2016 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> m.tr'.sz:, < ...*?..rlin.':JO,...:W '' .�?.ti¢�+s. cf:,r 4.1:41iVt <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Rain, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1230/1300 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, E.I.T, <br /> m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> Attachments: 0 Installation Records El OtherX <br /> Reviewed By: X <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT:GeoDesign representative, Benjamin Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner <br /> with Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 123. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 123: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign had identified an area on the west 1/4 to 1/3 of Lot 123 which would require over-excavation and <br /> replacement with permeable ballast material. GeoDesign previously observed that the area had been over-excavated 12 to <br /> 18 inches, lined with a geotextile material,and backfilled with permeable ballast material which had been compacted into a <br /> firm and unyielding mass. <br /> Today, GeoDesign observed the exposed foundation subgrade for the east 2/3 of Lot 123. The exposed foundation <br /> subgrade consisted of a gray silty SAND (f)with gravel (f-c)which could be penetrated less than 4 inches using 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade material was tested using Troxler <br /> Moisture-Density gauge. In-place density tests indicated that the material had been compacted to greater than 95%of its <br /> maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is GeoDesign's opinion that the exposed foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose or saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> the foundation prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear Density Gauge Data. <br /> The client and concrete contractor were notified of our observations via email prior to our departure from the site. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services,We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration tithe project irrespective old*presence of ourrepresentative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents:our firm is not responsible for site safety.Titls field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as Indicated b'initials In the"Reviewed gy':sectiott. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />