Laserfiche WebLink
1-`, s <br /> ") <br /> EOz FIELD REPORT . <br /> DESIGN_ Aof ,/ <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 032 <br /> GeoDesign#: _Polygon-127-03 Date: 04/28/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather:Clear, 50's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1645/1715 <br /> Distribution: _ __ _ - . <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> Attachments: 0 Site Plan(s) ❑ Density Test Summary _ Signature: <br /> y �✓ <br /> in Records m Other ! Reviewed By: nc <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 224 and 225. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 224: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 224. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown silty SAND <br /> with gravel (previously placed loose surcharge material)which could be probed 3 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe <br /> across the entire lot area. GeoDesign noted the PVC pipe associated with a settlement marker from Phase 2 (SM-23) <br /> which appeared to still be buried approximately 3 feet. <br /> GeoDeslgn notified Craig with DDS and the client that the lot area is currently unsuitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that the loose surcharge material be removed down to firm and unyielding material and <br /> replaced with structural fill material. <br /> Lot 225: <br /> Upon arrival,GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 225. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown silty SAND <br /> with gravel (previously placed loose surcharge material)which could be probed up to 3 feet using a 1/2 inch diameter soil <br /> probe. Material along the north side of the lot could be probed approximately 6 inches, 1 to 1.5 feet along the center, and <br /> 2.5 to 3 feet along the south side. <br /> GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS and the client that the lot area is currently unsuitable for support of the intended <br /> structure. GeoDesign recommends that the loose surcharge material be removed down to firm and unyielding material and <br /> replaced with structural fill material. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Photo Log. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> Specifications throughout the duration of the project Irrespective of the presence of our representative.Ourwork does not include supRtvision or direction of the contractor,the comrades employees <br /> or agents.Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />