4417 30TH DR SE 2018-03-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

, (3/ • ",i_my, G E oDz FIELD REPORT,, -2-o Project Name: • Everett River Front-Simpson _ ._.._.. .......... ....:.... ..... Report: 034 GeoDesign#': Polygon-127-03 Date: 05/02/2017 Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: PW1505-005 Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) • Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, _ _ W 50's Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) i Arrival/Departure:1530/1700 Distribution: ___....._-_-..___._.___._ ___...... _......_.._............ i_._._ __ —_.-----_.__._..._.....__.._.._.......__._.. Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) Paul McKee(City of Everett) ': Dave Foster(City of Everett) . Prepared By: Ben Weinberg m_Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: -- Attachments: ❑ Installation Records m Other Reviewed By: SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS (CONTINUED): Lot 237(CONTINUED): In-place density tests indicated that exposed foundation subgrade material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density It is the opinion of GeoDesign that theloundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for:support dfkthe intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be-removed from the base of the footing areas prior to the placement of concrete. Lot 261: Upon arrival,GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 261. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown to gray-brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c)which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. In-place density tests indicated that exposed foundation subgrade material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the footing areas prior to the placement of concrete. Lot 262: Upon arrival,GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 262. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown to gray-brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c)which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. In-place density tests indicated that exposed foundation subgrade material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of the footing areas prior to the placement of concrete. A summary of our observations and density tests can be found in the attached Figure 1,Nuclear Density Gauge Data,and Photo Log. This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By'section. 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095