My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4201 RUCKER AVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER 2019-04-10
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
4201
>
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
>
4201 RUCKER AVE COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER 2019-04-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2019 9:26:24 AM
Creation date
3/27/2018 12:05:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
4201
Tenant Name
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
Notes
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT INCLUDED
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geotechnical Engineering Report 4 May 25,2017 <br /> Central Everett CHC,Everett,Washington RGI Project No.2017-094 <br /> RGI reviewed the results of the field and laboratory testing and assessed the potential for <br /> liquefaction of the site's soil during an earthquake. Since the site is underlain by dense, <br /> glacially consolidated deposits, RGI considers that the possibility of liquefaction during an <br /> earthquake as minimal. <br /> 4.6 GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREAS <br /> Regulated geologically hazardous areas include erosion, landslide, earthquake, or other <br /> geological hazards. Based on the conditions observed on the site, the site does not <br /> contain geologically hazardous areas. <br /> 5.0 Discussion and Recommendations <br /> 5.1 GEOTECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> Based on our study, the site is suitable for the proposed construction from a geotechnical <br /> standpoint. RGI recommends that the proposed new building elements be supported on <br /> spread footings bearing on medium dense native soil or deep foundations consisting of - <br /> micro piles or helical anchors. <br /> Detailed recommendations regarding the above issues and other geotechnical design <br /> considerations are provided in the following sections. These recommendations should be <br /> incorporated into the final design drawings and construction specifications. <br /> 5.2 EARTHWORK <br /> The scope of the earthwork was not clear at the time this report was prepared but we <br /> expect the expanded building and new trash enclosure will require some excavations to <br /> allow footing and pile installation. <br /> 5.2.1 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL <br /> Potential sources or causes of erosion and sedimentation depend on construction <br /> methods, slope length and gradient, amount of soil exposed and/or disturbed, soil type,, <br /> construction sequencing and weather. The impacts on erosion-prone areas can be <br /> reduced by implementing an erosion and sedimentation control plan. The plan should be <br /> designed in accordance with applicable city and/or county standards. <br /> RGI recommends the following erosion control Best Management Practices (BMPs): <br /> • Scheduling site preparation and grading for the drier summer and early fall <br /> months and undertaking activities that expose soil during periods of little or no <br /> rainfall <br /> > Establishing a quarry spall construction entrance <br /> > Installing siltation control fencing or anchored straw or coir wattles on the <br /> downhill side of work areas <br /> 111 <br /> " <br /> RILEYGROUP <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.