4405 31ST AVE SE 2019-11-04 - Laserfiche WebLink

r DESLGN FIELD REP of 5RIU Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson I Report 049 GeoDesign#: Polygon-127-03 Date: 06/15/2017 ~Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: PW1505-005 Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) j Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather.Cloudy,60's Ron Bowen(Polygon) I Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1400/1600 Distribution: Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By. Ben Weinberg m Site Plan(s) 0 Density Test Summary Signature: Attachments: 0 Installation Records Lx., Other Reviewed By: PURPOSE of VISIT:GeoDesign representative,Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 263 to 268. SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: LOT 263: Previously,GeoDesign noted that Lot 263 had been over-excavated approximately 6 inches down to material which could be generally probed less than 2 inches and which in-place density tests indicated had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. Today, GeoDesign noted that the lot area had been backfilled with a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material which had been compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation area observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. LOT 264: Previously,GeoDesign noted that Lot 264 had been over-excavated approximately 1 foot down to material which could be generally probed less than 3 inches and which in-place density tests indicated had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. Today, GeoDesign noted that the lot area had been backfilled with a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material which had been compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation area observed today is currently suitable for support of the intended structure. LOT 264: Previously,GeoDesign noted thation6Ahad been over-excavated approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet down to material which could be generally probed less than 2 inches(with the exception of material near center that could be probed—6 inches and had been over-excavated 2 feet)and which in-place density tests indicated had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis.Also,GeoDesign previously noted that a non-woven geotextile material had been placed across the center of the lot area where deeper penetration depths were encountered. Today,GeoDesign noted that the lot area had been backfilled with a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material which had been compacted into a firm and unyielding mass. 'a heAp i i afC Q©sesrgrfuttrra tfa o fi att"c _ a 1 rvea = ' t OSIs PA 1010M+PRQI . 0e0d0+410Yre This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not indude supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees or agents.Our firm Is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials In the"Reviewed By"section. 10700 Meridian.Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 1206.838.9900 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 �. 1 I