Laserfiche WebLink
C17& V. -00. - <br /> , ”.j i), 31--.*iat/c. S <br /> v FIELD REPORT <br /> J E ,` a. <br /> Project Name: ! Everett River Front-Simpson Report 046 <br /> GeoDesign#: I Polygon-127-03 Date: 05/31/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> 1 <br /> �, ot. 7';'-‘ZSE 7 <br /> j Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) i Randy Allen(City of Everett) j Weather: Clear, 70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) i Eddy Stevens(Polygon) I Arrival/Departure: 0930/0945 <br /> Distribution: ;-____._.._......._._........._...._._.._...._..__.---___..._.__._____........................__....._._..__.._.____.__....._...._..._.........._.__......__.......__...._ _ _._..__..__......_..__..._._._______________...__._...._.____._...._.............__.._ <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) j Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> R1 Site Plan(s) ❑ Density Test Summary i Signature: ` .•.1i <br /> Attachments: i.______.._ _. ..... . __ <br /> I I 0 Installation Records m Other : Reviewed By: <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg,was on-site part time at the request of Craig with DDS to <br /> observe the foundation subgrade for Lots 259 and 260. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> LOT 259: "Y <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the east side of Lot 259 had been over-excavated approximately 1 foot. Today, <br /> GeoDesign noted that the lot area had been backfilled to plan bottom of footing with a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast <br /> material which had been tamped into a firm and unyielding mass. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. <br /> LOT 260: <br /> Previously, GeoDesign noted that the west 1/4 of Lot 260 had been over-excavated 6 inches to 1.5 feet and east side had <br /> been over-excavated approximately 1 foot. Today, GeoDesign noted that the lot area had been backfilled to plan bottom of <br /> footing with a 2-inch clean crushed railroad ballast material which had been tamped into a firm and unyielding mass. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the exposed foundation area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. <br /> A summary of our observations can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />