My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4439 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-03-29
>
Address Records
>
RIVERFRONT BLVD
>
4439
>
4439 RIVERFRONT BLVD 2018-03-29
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2018 2:34:13 PM
Creation date
3/29/2018 2:34:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RIVERFRONT BLVD
Street Number
4439
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GEODESIGNz FIELD REPORT <br /> of` <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 059 <br /> GeoDesign #: Polygon-127-03 Date: 07/19/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW1505-005 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy Allen(City of Everett) Weather: Clear, 60-70's <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 0945/1620 <br /> Distribution: <br /> Doug Ross(Polygon) Kirk Keck(City of Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg, EIT <br /> Attachments: m Site Plan(s) m Density Test Summary Signature: <br /> 0 Installation Records 0 Other Reviewed By: <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS (CONTINUED): <br /> LOT 231: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 231. According to <br /> Craig with DDS, the lot area near the center required approximately 1.5 feet of over-excavation to expose firm and <br /> unyielding ground. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray to gray-brown silty SAND <br /> (f-m)with gravel (f-c) and trace debris which could generally probed less than 2 inches for the west 2/3 of the lot area using <br /> a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe; for the east 1/3 of the lot area, GeoDesign encountered probing depths of approximately 18 <br /> inches below an approximately 4 inch dessicated surficial crust. GeoDesign recommended that the east side of the lot area <br /> be over-excavated down to firm and unyielding underlying soil. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade <br /> material on the west side of the lot area was tested using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated <br /> that the exposed material on the west 2/3rd's of the lot area had been compacted to greater than 95%of its maximum dry <br /> density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> GeoDesign noted that DDS over-excavated the east 1/3 of the lot area 1.5-2.0 feet today down to material which could be <br /> probed less than 2 inches. GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS that the excavation was currently suitable for placement of <br /> backfill material. GeoDesign noted that DDS was in the process of cement-treating material excavated from the lot areas <br /> for use as structural backfill material; the backfill material was placed and compacted after our departure from the site. <br /> LOT 232: <br /> Today, GeoDesign noted that DDS had completed excavation of the footing and crawl space area for Lot 232. GeoDesign <br /> noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a gray to gray-brown silty SAND (f-m)with gravel (f-c)and trace <br /> debris which could generally probed less than 2 inches for the west 1/3 and east 1/3 of the lot area using a 1/2 inch <br /> diameter soil probe; for the center 1/3 of the lot area, GeoDesign encountered probing depths of approximately 1.5 to 2.0 <br /> feet. GeoDesign recommended that the center 1/3 of the lot area be over-excavated down to firm and unyielding underlying <br /> soil. Relative compaction of the exposed foundation subgrade material on the east and west side of the lot area was tested <br /> using a Troxler Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density tests indicated that the exposed material had been compacted to <br /> greater than 95%of its maximum dry density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> GeoDesign noted that DDS over-excavated the center 1/3 of the lot area 1.5-2.0 feet today down to material which could <br /> be probed less than 2 inches. GeoDesign notified Craig with DDS that the excavation was currently suitable for placement <br /> of backfill material. GeoDesign noted that DDS was in the process of cement-treating material excavated from the lot areas <br /> for use as structural backfill material; the backfill material was placed and compacted after our departure from the site. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative.Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety.This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations.The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.