Laserfiche WebLink
C14/0 -a2 3 <br /> 3) D1 <br /> ' u FIELD REPORT <br /> ME 1 of 3 <br /> Project Name: Everett River Front-Simpson Report: 030 <br /> ( GeoDesign #: Polygon-127-03 Date: 04/07/2017 <br /> Reports with Unresolved Nonconformance Issues: Permit: <br /> PW 1505-005 <br /> f-'1., ., '‘',--;:t;;;.,„ rr..W.Wa`'73*'' ''':............5. .... '......... . ( '':‘:'-.'•- v-.: �S .5.... <br /> a <br /> n <br /> AllCloudy, 50 <br /> Nick Abdelnour(Polygon) Randy e (City of Everett) Weather:...................�.._ s <br /> Ron Bowen(Polygon) Eddy Stevens(Polygon) Arrival/Departure: 1615/1700 <br /> Distribution: __.,......... __..__._...._.._......................_............ <br /> Kirk Keck(Cityof <br /> 1 Doug Ross(Polygon) Everett) <br /> Paul McKee(City of Everett) Dave Foster(City of Everett) Prepared By: Ben Weinberg <br /> © Site Plan(s) © Density Test Summary Signature: 4;-,. <br /> Attachments. <br /> ❑ Installation Records ❑ Other : Reviewed By 1 <br /> PURPOSE of VISIT: GeoDesign representative, Ben Weinberg, was on-site part time at the request of John Feltner with <br /> Polygon to observe the foundation subgrade for Lot 170. <br /> SUMMARY of OBSERVATIONS: <br /> Lot 170: <br /> Upon arrival, GeoDesign noted that the foundation excavation subcontractor had completed excavation of the footing and <br /> crawl space area for Lot 170. GeoDesign noted that the exposed foundation subgrade consisted of a brown-gray to gray <br /> silty SAND with gravel which could generally be probed less than 2 inches using a 1/2 inch diameter soil probe. <br /> Relative compaction of the footing subgrade material was tested using a Troxier Moisture-Density gauge; in-place density <br /> tests indicated that exposed foundation subgrade material had been compacted to greater than 95% of its maximum dry <br /> density as determined by a Modified Proctor analysis. <br /> It is the opinion of GeoDesign that the foundation subgrade area observed today is currently suitable for support of the <br /> intended structure. GeoDesign recommends that any surficially loose and saturated material be removed from the base of <br /> the footing areas prior to the placement of concrete. <br /> A summary of our observations and density tests taken today can be found in the attached Figure 1 and Nuclear Density <br /> Gauge Data. <br /> This report presents opinions formed as a result of our observation of activities relating to geotechnical engineering or environmental services.We rely on the contractor to comply with the plans and <br /> specifications throughout the duration of the project irrespective of the presence of our representative. Our work does not include supervision or direction of the contractor,the contractor's employees <br /> or agents. Our firm is not responsible for site safety. This field report is a DRAFT representation of our field observations,testing,and preliminary recommendations. The report can only be considered <br /> final upon review of the GeoDesign project manager,as indicated by initials in the"Reviewed By"section. <br /> 10700 Meridian Avenue North,Suite 402 I Seattle,WA 98133 I 206.838.9900 <br /> 2502 Jefferson Avenue I Tacoma,WA 98402 I 253.203.0095 » <br />