My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2201 100TH ST SW AURORA DOOR 2018-03-30
>
Address Records
>
100TH ST SW
>
2201
>
AURORA DOOR
>
2201 100TH ST SW AURORA DOOR 2018-03-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2018 2:44:27 PM
Creation date
3/30/2018 2:44:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
100TH ST SW
Street Number
2201
Tenant Name
AURORA DOOR
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4PF <br /> WEST <br /> COAST <br /> S TRUCTURAL b L <br /> ENGINEERING, INC. <br /> 1624 GROVE ST,UNIT D2 MARYSVILLE,WA 98270 (360)386-9689 wcse.net <br /> November 2, 2016 <br /> GLY �- <br /> 200 112th Ave NE ' 101 <br /> Suite 300 <br /> Karol- <br /> !� <br /> Bellevue,WA 98004 <br /> Attention: Brian Taylor, Superintendent, GLY <br /> Mike Massengill; Foreman, GLY <br /> Subject: Shearwall nailing. <br /> AD Systems <br /> Mezzanine Addition <br /> 2201 100th St SW <br /> Everett,WA <br /> WCSE Project No:W4197 <br /> To whom it may concern, <br /> This letter is a follow up to conversations with Brian Taylor and Mike Massengilj of GLY construction <br /> regarding the above referenced subject. <br /> It is our understanding that the building inspector flagged the shearwall nailing during inspections. The <br /> nails were overdriven. GLY renailed the sheathing and missed calling for reinspection before finishing. <br /> Mayes testing, the testing agency involved in this project, requested that GLY provide guidance from the <br /> engineer of record for this project prior to issuing a final letter. <br /> A description of the work and photos were supplied to WCSE regarding this matter. A summary of the <br /> findings are as follows. <br /> The worst case loading, based on the structural calculations, for the shearwalls in question is 135 plf. <br /> With the proper nailing,the allowed capacity is 240 plf. The overdriven nails would reduce this allowed <br /> capacity. From the photos, it appears the nails were overdriven by about 1/8"or roughly 25%the depth of <br /> the sheathing. The reduction in allowable shear force would also be around 25%. This is if the sheathing <br /> were not renailed properly. <br /> Our recommendation is as follows: <br /> Based on the shearwall capacity to still be acceptable with the less than ideal nailing, and that the <br /> sheathing nailing was corrected by the foreman of GLY, the nailing as presented should be sufficient <br /> without any additional corrective measures to satisfy design loads. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.