Laserfiche WebLink
Regulatory Consultation <br /> Professional heuristic Development Equivalency Determination <br /> Technical Instruction <br /> Educational Planning <br /> March 25, 2005 <br /> Brian A. O ' Connor, P. E. <br /> Manager <br /> Everett Site - Workplace Services <br /> Shared Services Group <br /> The Boeing Company <br /> P.O. Box 3707 MC OH-56 <br /> Seattle, WA 98124-2207 <br /> Dear Mr . O'Connor: <br /> At your request, I have reviewed The Boeing Company' s proposed <br /> airlock door opening procedure for potential building code <br /> ramifications . I understand that there is a current policy that <br /> only one airlock transportation door between connected Buildings <br /> 40-21 and 40-51 and Buildings 40-36 and 40-37 respectively, are to <br /> be open at any given time. I also understand that it is currently <br /> desired that both transportation doors in a given airlock be open <br /> simultaneously for operational purposes . <br /> I have requested that The Boeing Company provide any documentation <br /> of the current policy in order to determine the concerns or <br /> rationale behind the current policy. No such documentation could <br /> be located. Assuming that the policy was based on some building <br /> code or fire code concern, that requirement would have been based <br /> on the edition of the Uniform Building or Fire Code in effect at <br /> that particular time. My evaluation of the proposed door operation <br /> procedure will be a contemporary analysis based on the 2003 <br /> Edition of the International Building Code (IBC) , the currently <br /> adopted building code in the State of Washington. <br /> Logically, the present policy originated out of the fact that the <br /> 40-37 and 40-51 buildings are Group H-2 Occupancies . The 40-21 <br /> and 40-36 buildings are part of a connected unlimited area <br /> building complex housing ordinary hazard factory-industrial uses . <br /> If the 40-37 and 40-51 buildings were also ordinary hazard <br /> occupancies, they could be considered portions of the same <br /> unlimited area building (Section 503 . 1 . 3 ) . Inasmuch as the <br /> subject buildings do not qualify for the provisions of Section <br /> 503 . 1 . 3 , they necessarily must be regarded as different buildings <br /> on the same lot . <br /> The building code provision that most closely relates to the <br /> ability to keep exterior building doors open is Section 704 . 12 <br /> (opening protection at exterior walls) . Section 704 . 12 references <br /> Section 704 . 8 for the determination of opening protective <br /> requirements based on fire separation distance (proximity to lot <br /> Post Office Box 99515, Magnolia Station, Seattle, Washington 98199 <br /> Telephone: (206) 274-9347 <br />