My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-22 2018-09-21
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
3003
>
BLDG 40-22
>
3003 W CASINO RD BLDG 40-22 2018-09-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2018 4:20:03 PM
Creation date
4/27/2018 9:18:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
3003
Tenant Name
BLDG 40-22
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
| | | �J �l WRIGHT —) �z �� zl �� } <br /> LUND ' ' _ ' ' � -� ^ ~~ ' ^ . ^ �- <br /> SrRuctuR A L Ems / wE E Rs <br /> Client: Boeing Everett Facility <br /> STRUCTURAL REPORTSite Name: Boeing Skylights <br /> Project Number: EVE-12-2611 #Z, <br /> (47.92450,-122.27459) 5 <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION: <br /> Boeing proposed to add (7) additional skylight units on top of the mentioned rooftop. <br /> /\N/\L`yS|8: <br /> The purpose ofthis analysis is to determine if the existing structure is structurally adequate to support the <br /> proposed loadings and provide any recommendations for modification in order to bring the structure into <br /> compliance if needed. The structure has been analyzed in accordance with the 2009 International <br /> Building code, The additional design criteria used inour analysis ioaofollows: <br /> ° 86mph C3-soogust) ° Occupancy Category U <br /> ° Wind Exposure B ° Seismic Design Category D <br /> ° Topographic Factor, Kt= 1.O ° SDS = O.845. So1 = 0.460 <br /> RESULTS/ <br /> | <br /> Existing Roofs: Structurally Adequate ! <br /> Skylight Framing: � <br /> � <br /> Please refer to calculations for structural analysis supporting the above results as well as the conclusions � <br /> section below for additional comments. � <br /> VVetrust this addresses your concerns. Please contact uuifthere are any questions. <br /> CONCLUSION: <br /> To the best of our knowledge and belief, the existing structure with the proposed loading as listed in ` <br /> above ieinsatisfactory compliance with the requirements of the specifications, codes and agencies � <br /> having jurisdiction over the work. <br /> Tt � ! <br /> ' <br /> , <br /> 1 <br /> ` <br /> � <br /> PropuredBy EhkEvenson. BI <br /> Checked By: Pote0pauh|. P.E. S.E <br /> Dated: June 22, 2012 <br /> 1201 1 Avenue South, Suite 310, Seattle, WA 98134 - 206.402.5156 www.lwo-se.com <br /> ^ <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.