Laserfiche WebLink
is hereby amended to read as follows: <br /> Section 20: APPEAL OF EXAMINER'S DECISION. Any party aggrieved by the <br /> Examiner's final decision on any action listed in Section 12.A.1, <br /> may submit an appeal in writing to the City Council, by filing same <br /> with the City Clerk, within ten (10) working days from the date of <br /> the Examiner's written decision, requesting a review of same. <br /> There will be no fee charged for such appeals. <br /> Thereupon the Examiner shall cause to be forwarded to the City <br /> Council all of the pertinent documents and exhibits, including <br /> his/her written decision, findings, conclusions and notice of appeal. <br /> If, after the examination of such record at a public meeting, the <br /> Council determines that a substantial error in fact or law may exist <br /> in the record, it shall remand the proceeding to the Examiner for <br /> reconsideration as provided to Section 19 or, after conducting a <br /> public hearing, it may modify, remand or reverse the decision of <br /> the Examiner accordingly. <br /> A transcription of the hearing record shall be transmitted to the <br /> City Council at least five (5) working days before the date and time <br /> at which the Council shall consider such appeal. <br /> The cost of transcription of said hearing record shall be borne by <br /> the person requesting said transcription unless otherwise <br /> determined by the City Council. Notice of the filing of an appeal <br /> shall be made to all parties of record to the hearing, and said <br /> notice shall give the time and date when the Council will consider <br /> such appeal. The City Council may also hold a public hearing to <br /> receive any new or additional evidence that same could not have <br /> been reasonably available at the time of such hearing before the <br /> Examiner. The City Council shall accept, modify or reject any <br /> findings or conclusions or remand the decision of the Examiner for <br /> further hearings. The Council's decison shall be in writing and shall <br /> specify modified or amended findings, and conclusions whenever <br /> such findings or conclusions are different from those of the <br /> appealed decision, which may be incorporated or included by <br /> reference in any resolution or ordinance, as the case may be. Each <br /> material finding shall be supported by substantial evidence in the <br /> record. The burden of proof with regard to modification or <br /> reversal of the Examiner's decision shall rest with the appellant. <br /> Section 3: That Section 21 of Ord. No. 692-80 as amended by Ord. No.'s 819- <br /> 81 and 823-81 which now reads as follows: <br /> Section 21: EXAMINER'S RECOMMENDATION, FINAL COUNCIL ACTION. <br /> Any application requiring action by the City Council shall be taken <br /> by the adoption of a resolution or ordinance by the Council. When <br /> taking any such final action, the Council shall make and enter <br /> findings of fact from the record and conclusions therefrom which <br /> support its action. The City Council may adopt all or portions of <br /> the Examiner's findings and conclusions. The action of the Council, <br /> approving, modifying, or rejecting a decision of the Examiner, shall <br /> be final and conclusive, unless within fifteen (15) working days <br /> from the date of the action an aggrieved party or person obtains a <br /> writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of Washington for <br /> Snohomish County, for purpose of review of the action taken. <br /> Provided, however, appeals from City Council decisions on <br /> shoreline management substantial development permits shall be <br /> taken to the Shoreline Hearings Board pursuant to the provisions of <br /> RCW 90.58. <br /> -6- <br />