Laserfiche WebLink
Supplement to Council Packet <br /> Wednesday May 9, 2018 <br /> Information provided by: Philip Dawdy, Josh Estes & Sean L. 0 Sullivan <br /> Case for Five Additional Retail Stores <br /> When the Washington Liquor and Cannabis Board allocated an additional five retail licenses to Everett <br /> in 2016, its intent was to fully serve the existing medical patient market and to eliminate the illicit <br /> market for adult-use sales. The statewide average distribution of stores per capita is about one store per <br /> 12,000 residents. With the current moratorium on the additional five stores in Everett, the city has a <br /> distribution of one store per 22,000 residents, one of the lowest concentrations of stores of any <br /> municipality in Washington. This lowered concentration directly impacts existing medical patients who <br /> do not have the level of access that they had prior to the elimination of the medical market. If all 10 <br /> stores are allowed for in Everett, then the city's distribution would line up closer to the statewide <br /> average at one store per 11,000 residents, making it easier for customers and medical patients alike to <br /> reach these stores. <br /> More Stores Eliminates the Illicit Market <br /> Using Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood as an example: when the WSLCB enacted its first round of <br /> retail licensing in 2014, one store opened in this Seattle neighborhood and yet, the illicit market for <br /> cannabis continued apace. It was only after that another store opened in 2016, (following the second <br /> round of retail store licensing),that long-time commercial "pot dealers" in the neighborhood were <br /> pushed out of business. Increasing the number of stores allowed in Everett will have a similar impact as <br /> it did in the Seattle example, which will increase access to licensed, legal and responsible shops aiding <br /> in the elimination of the black market. <br /> The 500 Foot Dispersion Rule Works <br /> Not all communities in the state have dispersion rules for stores, (primarily because they are smaller <br /> cities or counties with smaller store allocations), but for those which do have the one store within 300 <br /> to 1,000 feet of another store rule, not a single community has felt the need to re-adjust the dispersion <br /> rule after the fact. This is an indication that such a dispersion rule is working well in King County and <br /> Tacoma. <br /> Part of the reason a decrease to 500 feet in Everett is needed is simply to make more potential retail <br /> locations available to the second round of five stores than would be available under the current 2,500 <br /> foot dispersion rule, which is one of the toughest in the state. Allowing for a reduced dispersion rule <br /> will set the additional shops up for the kind of success that will benefit the city as a whole. We are not <br /> opposed to a buffer of 1000 feet if the council feels that it is too early to reduce to 500 feet at this time. <br /> Options on Buffers <br /> Another means to potentially creating more available real estate would be to recommend that some of <br /> the non-K-12 school and non-playground sensitive use buffers be shortened from their current 1,000 <br /> feet from stores. This is allowed for under state law per 2015's S. 2136 and is in conformity with <br />