My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9910 EVERGREEN WAY SPRINT ANTENNA 2018-10-30
>
Address Records
>
EVERGREEN WAY
>
9910
>
SPRINT ANTENNA
>
9910 EVERGREEN WAY SPRINT ANTENNA 2018-10-30
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2018 2:55:23 PM
Creation date
5/29/2018 1:31:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
EVERGREEN WAY
Street Number
9910
Tenant Name
SPRINT ANTENNA
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
September 10,2017 <br /> 88-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 880407 <br /> TEP Project Number 51358.131860,Application 404644, Revision 1 Page 5 <br /> 3.1) Analysis Method <br /> tnxTower (version 7.0.5.1), a commercially available analysis software package, was used to create a <br /> three-dimensional model of the tower and calculate member stresses for various loading cases. <br /> Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A. <br /> 3.2) Assumptions <br /> 1) The tower and foundation were built in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. <br /> 2) The tower and foundation have been maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's <br /> specification. <br /> 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as <br /> specified in Tables 1 and 2, and "Appendix B—Base Level Drawing". <br /> 4) All tower components are in sufficient condition to carry their full design capacity. <br /> 5) Serviceability with respect to antenna twist, tilt, roll, or lateral translation, is not checked and is <br /> left to the carrier or tower owner to ensure conformance. <br /> 6) All antenna mounts and mounting hardware are structurally sufficient to carry the full design <br /> capacity requirements of appurtenance wind area and weight as provided by the original <br /> manufacturer specifications. It is the carrier's responsibility to ensure compliance to the <br /> structural limitations of the existing and/or proposed antenna mounts. TEP did not analyze <br /> antennas supporting mounts as part of this structural analysis report. <br /> This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. Tower <br /> Engineering Professionals should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the <br /> tower. <br /> 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> Table 5-Section Capacity(Summary) <br /> Section % <br /> I Component Critical Elevation(ft) Size P(K) Pall"(K) Pass/Fail <br /> No. Type Element Capacity <br /> Li 88-42.25 Pole TP20.865x14x0.1875 1 -4.07 877.99 41.7 * Pass <br /> { L2 42.25-0 Pole TP26.83x20.0773x0.1875 2 -7.62 1053.84 69.6 Pass <br /> Summary <br /> Pole(L2) 69.6 Pass <br /> RATING= 69.6 Pass <br /> Table 6-Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity <br /> Notes Component Elevation (ft) %Capacity Pass/Fail <br /> 1 Anchor Rods - 59.3 Pass <br /> 1 Base Plate - 46.4 Pass <br /> 1 Base Foundation Soil Interaction - 50.4 Pass <br /> 1 ; Base Foundation Structural I 23.9 j Pass <br /> Structure Rating (max from all components)= 69.6% <br /> Notes: <br /> 1) See additional documentation in"Appendix C-Additional Calculations"for calculations supporting the%capacity listed. <br /> tnxTower Report-version 7.0.5.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.