My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2215 MERRILL CREEK PKY VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA 2018-06-07
>
Address Records
>
MERRILL CREEK PKY
>
2215
>
VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA
>
2215 MERRILL CREEK PKY VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA 2018-06-07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/7/2018 3:47:34 PM
Creation date
6/7/2018 3:47:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
MERRILL CREEK PKY
Street Number
2215
Tenant Name
VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 12,2017 <br /> 150-ft Monopole Tower Structural Analysis Report CCI BU No 826263 <br /> TEP Project Number 46302.115847,Application 387666, Revision 1 Page 6 <br /> 4)ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> Table 5-Section Capacity(Summary) <br /> Section Elevation(ft) Component Size Element P(lb) 4Peiww(Ib) Capacity _Critical % PFai!ass/ <br /> L1 150.083-119.666 Pole TP36.21x30.125x0.188 1 -9168.69 1178140.00 '. 23.8 Pass <br /> L2 119.666-92.2497 Pole TP41.314x34.751 x0 375 2 -17192.60 3453250.00 + 22.8 Pass <br /> L3 92.2497-45.6663 Pole TP49.873x39.348x0 5 3 -38186.40 5681010.00 35.9 Pass <br /> L4 <br /> 45.6663-0 Pole TP58x47.441x0.625 4 -66191.30 8498710.00 40.6 Pass <br /> Summary <br /> Pole(L4) 40.6 Pass <br /> Rating 1 74 40.6 Pass <br /> Table 6-Tower Component Stresses vs. Capacity <br /> Notes Component Elevation(ft) %Capacity Pass/Fail <br /> 1 Anchor Rods - 72.3 Pass <br /> 1...___ Base Plate _ 41.2 Pass <br /> 1 Base Foundation Soil Interaction - 40.4 Pass <br /> 1 Base Foundation Structural - 83.2 Pass <br /> Structure Rating (max from all components)= 83.2% <br /> Notes: <br /> 1) See additional documentation in"Appendix C-Additional Calculations"for calculations supporting the%capacity listed. <br /> 4.1) Recommendations <br /> 1) If the load differs from that described in Tables 1 and 2 of this report, "Appendix B—Base Level <br /> Drawing" or the provisions of this analysis are found to be invalid, another structural analysis <br /> should be performed. <br /> 2) The tower and its foundation have sufficient capacity to carry the proposed load configuration. <br /> No modifications are required at this time. <br /> tnxTower Report-version 7.0.5.1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.