Laserfiche WebLink
C' <br /> Summary of Phase Two Feedback <br /> 1 I a_`,I _a`poA _k-, : 1 ,1-:=-F- 'lhc1 i,+ L! s< _i,i�Ilj V1!ie c �/i?r]!J@ as'F\VO c@.401@.)1A iltWi15s'd @II <br /> a i =„c II r_,_ :rs ii-= - - E 5nIi1-014141@:kitiCnlig ciNA:PJ'cikEf1t:Altalin�pU YvIs <br /> .:_Sir-o Ql5Inj cls Ufl1 mrlif It :e QR ]S5 "UNIkPfro@n 3(i._ft,il.Nt5 <br /> ' % t®lpfir rii=0� <br /> - �— -- - ri 0 0 0 • <br /> E MN <br /> •D M. :� <br /> j R2.1.i‘ 4)''J') / <br /> - •i li ,\ it I <br /> ` f ,i. t. <br /> A <br /> ! A <br /> - _ I; ,, ..,:.--,,,. . i[. 1 <br /> ► Buses would come more often during the ► People wouldn't have to walk as far to reach <br /> busiest times, so you wouldn't always have a transit stop <br /> to check a schedule ► More households and jobs would be within <br /> ► Buses would come more often in the middle walking distance of transit <br /> of the day, at night, and on weekends, so ► Service may take you directly where you're <br /> that transit would be available when you going, so you wouldn't have to transfer as <br /> need to travel often <br /> ► More people would choose to ride the bus, ► Service would be more accessible to low- <br /> so not as many people would be driving cars income and minority Everett residents <br /> ► Riders could connect more easily to the <br /> broader region at key transit centers for light <br /> rail, commuter rail, and bus rapid transit <br /> For the public, the frequency service option was slightly more favorable than the coverage <br /> option. Additionally, a frequency-based approach provided Everett Transit with the ability <br /> to carry the most riders and accommodate the expected growth. Based on the public's <br /> response, Everett Transit developed a Growth Network Plan that would be based on the <br /> frequency service option while incorporating elements from the coverage concept. <br /> 4 <br /> 1 9 <br /> 26 Connecting Your Future <br />